Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] alpha version numbering discussion from summit

2014-11-13 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Hellmann wrote: The outcome of the “Should Oslo continue to use alpha versions” session at the summit [1] was unclear, so I would like to continue the discussion here. As we discussed at the summit, the primary reason for marking Oslo library releases as alphas was to indicate that

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] alpha version numbering discussion from summit

2014-11-13 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 13, 2014, at 3:52 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: The outcome of the “Should Oslo continue to use alpha versions” session at the summit [1] was unclear, so I would like to continue the discussion here. As we discussed at the summit, the primary

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] alpha version numbering discussion from summit

2014-11-13 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-11-13 07:50:51 -0500 (-0500), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] I do remember a comment at some point, and I’m not sure it was in this session, about using the per-project client libraries as “internal only” libraries when the new SDK matures enough that we can declare that the official

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] alpha version numbering discussion from summit

2014-11-13 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Nov 13, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-11-13 07:50:51 -0500 (-0500), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] I do remember a comment at some point, and I’m not sure it was in this session, about using the per-project client libraries as “internal only” libraries

[openstack-dev] [oslo] alpha version numbering discussion from summit

2014-11-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
The outcome of the “Should Oslo continue to use alpha versions” session at the summit [1] was unclear, so I would like to continue the discussion here. As we discussed at the summit, the primary reason for marking Oslo library releases as alphas was to indicate that the library is under