On 28 November 2013 10:14, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
For this specific block zero'ing case it occurred to me that it might
be sufficient to just invoke 'ionice dd' instead of 'dd' and give it
a lower I/O priority class than normal.
Excuse the thread necromancy, I've just
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 04:15:03PM +, Duncan Thomas wrote:
On 28 November 2013 10:14, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
For this specific block zero'ing case it occurred to me that it might
be sufficient to just invoke 'ionice dd' instead of 'dd' and give it
a lower I/O
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:34:15PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:43:42PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 18:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:10:47PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 17:43, Daniel P. Berrange
Moving this to the ml as requested, would appreciate
comments/thoughts/feedback.
So, I recently proposed a small patch to the oslo rpc code (initially in
oslo-incubator then moved to oslo.messaging) which extends the existing
support for limiting the rpc thread pool so that concurrent requests
Hi,
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 14:45 +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
Moving this to the ml as requested, would appreciate
comments/thoughts/feedback.
Thanks, I too would appreciate input from others.
So, I recently proposed a small patch to the oslo rpc code (initially in
oslo-incubator then
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:45:22PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
Moving this to the ml as requested, would appreciate
comments/thoughts/feedback.
So, I recently proposed a small patch to the oslo rpc code (initially in
oslo-incubator then moved to oslo.messaging) which extends the
On 27/11/13 15:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:45:22PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
Moving this to the ml as requested, would appreciate
comments/thoughts/feedback.
So, I recently proposed a small patch to the oslo rpc code (initially in
oslo-incubator then moved
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:39:30PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 15:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:45:22PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
Moving this to the ml as requested, would appreciate
comments/thoughts/feedback.
So, I recently proposed a
On 27/11/13 17:43, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:39:30PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 15:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:45:22PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
Moving this to the ml as requested, would appreciate
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:10:47PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 17:43, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:39:30PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 15:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:45:22PM +, Edward Hope-Morley
On 27/11/13 18:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:10:47PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 17:43, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:39:30PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 15:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:43:42PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 18:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:10:47PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 17:43, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:39:30PM +, Edward Hope-Morley
On 27/11/13 19:34, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:43:42PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 18:20, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:10:47PM +, Edward Hope-Morley wrote:
On 27/11/13 17:43, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013
13 matches
Mail list logo
