Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-10-12 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Oct 12, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Li Ma skywalker.n...@gmail.com wrote: On 2014/9/17 22:34, Doug Hellmann wrote: The documentation in the oslo.messaging repository [2] would be a good place to start for that. If we decide deployers/operators need the information we can either refer to it

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-10-11 Thread Li Ma
On 2014/9/17 22:34, Doug Hellmann wrote: The documentation in the oslo.messaging repository [2] would be a good place to start for that. If we decide deployers/operators need the information we can either refer to it from the guides managed by the documentation team or we can move/copy the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-20 Thread Li Ma
Hi all, I almost lost this new thread for discussing with ZeroMQ issue. On 2014/9/19 5:29, Eric Windisch wrote: I believe it makes good sense for all drivers, in the long term. However, the most immediate benefits would be in offloading any drivers that need substantial work or improvements,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-19 Thread Ben Nemec
On 09/19/2014 08:38 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:29:27 Eric Windisch wrote: That?s great feedback, Eric, thank you. I know some of the other projects +1 - yes, excellent feedback - having just worked on the AMQP 1.0 driver, I think you've nicely described some of my own

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-19 Thread Mehdi Abaakouk
Hi, For me, the lack of tests is why reviews are not done, even some of them are critical. An other issue, less problematic, of this driver is it relies on eventlet directly, but all the eventlet code should be only localized into oslo.messaging._executor.impl_eventlet. Otherwise, I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-19 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Ken Giusti kgiu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon Sep 8 15:18:35 UTC 2014, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Sep 8, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Antonio Messina antonio.s.messina at gmail.com wrote: Hi All, We tested briefly ZeroMQ with Havana last year, but we couldn't find any

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 17/09/14 15:34, Doug Hellmann wrote: This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the conversation to the -dev list where we usually have those sorts of discussions. [...] I'd also like to document the current design of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the conversation to the -dev list where we usually have those sorts of discussions. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2014-September/009253.html I saw this

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the conversation to the -dev list where we usually have those sorts of discussions. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 09/18/2014 04:16 PM, Kapil Thangavelu wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the conversation to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Kapil, I see just 2 relevant reviews for zmq in the oslo.messaging queue: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.messaging+status:open+file:%255E.*zmq.*,n,z Are there others i am missing? (fix critical items, tests from your email) thanks, dims On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:16

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Kapil Thangavelu kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the conversation

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Eric Windisch
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Kapil Thangavelu kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/17/2014 04:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
Hi Davanum The two primary fixes to oslo.messaging outstanding to get things running are https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84938/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/120745/ cheers, Kapil On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: Kapil, I see just 2 relevant

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Sep 18, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Eric Windisch e...@windisch.us wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:16 AM, Kapil Thangavelu kapil.thangav...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Flavio Percoco

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-18 Thread Eric Windisch
That’s great feedback, Eric, thank you. I know some of the other projects are moving drivers out of the main core tree, and we could certainly consider doing that here as well, if we have teams willing to sign up for the work it means doing. In addition to the zmq driver, we have a fairly

[openstack-dev] [oslo] zeromq work for kilo

2014-09-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
This thread [1] has turned more “future focused, so I’m moving the conversation to the -dev list where we usually have those sorts of discussions. [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2014-September/009253.html On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:54 AM, James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: