Congrats Rich !
On 11/04/2015 05:10 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
> On 11/03/2015 03:56 PM, Matt Fischer wrote:
>> Sorry I replied to this right away but used the wrong email address and
>> it bounced!
>>
>>> I've appreciated all of richs v3 contributions to keystone. +1 from me.
> 2 positives vote
congratulations Rich!!
- Mensaje original -
> De: "Emilien Macchi"
> Para: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Enviados: Miércoles, 4 de Noviembre 2015 9:10:17
> Asunto: Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating puppet-key
On 11/03/2015 03:56 PM, Matt Fischer wrote:
> Sorry I replied to this right away but used the wrong email address and
> it bounced!
>
>> I've appreciated all of richs v3 contributions to keystone. +1 from me.
2 positives votes from our core-reviewer team.
No negative vote at all.
I guess that'
Sorry I replied to this right away but used the wrong email address and it
bounced!
> I've appreciated all of richs v3 contributions to keystone. +1 from me.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot
wrote:
> He's very good reviewer with a deep knowledge of keystone and puppet.
> Thank
He's very good reviewer with a deep knowledge of keystone and puppet.
Thank you Richard for your help.
+1
Emilien Macchi writes:
> At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team.
> We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our
> modules that would have +2 power.
>
>
On 10/31/2015 08:55 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team.
We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our
modules that would have +2 power.
I would like to start with puppet-keystone:
https://review.openstack.org/240666
And propos
ge questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Creating puppet-keystone-core and
proposing Richard Megginson core-reviewer
+1
Big thanks for Rich for all the work he’s done so far.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Adam Young
mailto:ayo
+1
Big thanks for Rich for all the work he’s done so far.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 10/31/2015 10:55 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
> At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team.
> We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our
> modules
On 10/31/2015 10:55 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team.
We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our
modules that would have +2 power.
I would like to start with puppet-keystone:
https://review.openstack.org/240666
And propos
While I am not core, I would like to say that Rich's leadership in
improving our Keystone Puppet module has been immensely valuable. +1 from
me.
-Matthew
On Oct 31, 2015 5:58 PM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote:
> At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team.
> We decided to investigate the creat
At the Summit we discussed about scaling-up our team.
We decided to investigate the creation of sub-groups specific to our
modules that would have +2 power.
I would like to start with puppet-keystone:
https://review.openstack.org/240666
And propose Richard Megginson part of this group.
Rich is l
11 matches
Mail list logo
