On 04/22/2015 08:03 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
* shell testing: yes because it's the way we wrote our providers.
We don't necessary need to shell out, but instead implement resources
for Serverspec which will use openstackclient to test Keystone/Nova/...
resources. I'm currently in process of m
On 04/22/2015 10:51 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Hi,
Some important work is being done on Keystone v3 API support in
puppet-keystone.
We've clearly seen there is a lack of review and I think we all worry
about breaking something.
Spencer & I are working on beaker tests lately and the jobs are
non-v
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 02:03:13PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>
> On 04/22/2015 11:53 AM, Spencer Krum wrote:
> > Emillen,
> >
> > Do you see shelling out to openstackclient in the keystone test to
> > verify that the keystone resources have been created? Do you see trying
> > to hit the api
On 04/22/2015 11:53 AM, Spencer Krum wrote:
> Emillen,
>
> Do you see shelling out to openstackclient in the keystone test to
> verify that the keystone resources have been created? Do you see trying
> to hit the api from something like aviator? Ultimately I'd like to see
> us spin up an entire
Emillen,
Do you see shelling out to openstackclient in the keystone test to verify
that the keystone resources have been created? Do you see trying to hit the
api from something like aviator? Ultimately I'd like to see us spin up an
entire openstack in one test then hit it with tempest.
It may be
Hi,
Some important work is being done on Keystone v3 API support in
puppet-keystone.
We've clearly seen there is a lack of review and I think we all worry
about breaking something.
Spencer & I are working on beaker tests lately and the jobs are
non-voting for now.
I propose:
* to review (and even
