Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Why do we have two providers for openstack_config ?

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > Hi, > > I stumbled on the fact that there are two providers for the > openstack_config type: ruby[1]; ini_setting.rb[2]. > > The ruby's one has a fork of the inifile ruby's provider is there[3]. > > It is currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Why do we have two providers for openstack_config ?

Hi, I kinda answered all my question myself. Here a sum up of what I have understood https://review.openstack.org/#/c/354094/ Feel free to review. Regards, Sofer Athlan-Guyot writes: > Hi, > > I stumbled on the fact that there are two providers for the >

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Why do we have two providers for openstack_config ?

Hi, I stumbled on the fact that there are two providers for the openstack_config type: ruby[1]; ini_setting.rb[2]. The ruby's one has a fork of the inifile ruby's provider is there[3]. It is currently used by those 6 types: - neutron_lbaas_service_config - nova_config -