Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-07 Thread Monty Taylor
On 08/07/2017 11:55 AM, Boden Russell wrote: On 8/4/17 1:26 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: That's not going to work for dozens of OpenStack projects. It's just won't scale. Every project should maintain plugin for their project. And it should be enough to say "pip install python-client" that

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-07 Thread Boden Russell
On 8/4/17 1:26 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > > That's not going to work for dozens of OpenStack projects. It's just > won't scale. Every project should maintain plugin for their project. And > it should be enough to say "pip install python-client" that > extend the Core OpenStack python client and

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Monty Taylor
On 08/04/2017 04:03 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: [...] * Both shade and python-openstackclient have investigated using openstacksdk as their REST layer but were unable to because it puts some abstractions in layers that make

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Clark Boylan
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017, at 02:37 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: > On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 12:26 -0700, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > > By the way stevedore is really providing very bad plugin experience > > and should not be used definitely.  > > Perhaps entrypointer[1]? ;) > > [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 12:26 -0700, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > By the way stevedore is really providing very bad plugin experience > and should not be used definitely.  Perhaps entrypointer[1]? ;) [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/entrypointer -- Kevin L. Mitchell signature.asc

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Dean Troyer
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: [...] > * Both shade and python-openstackclient have investigated using openstacksdk > as their REST layer but were unable to because it puts some abstractions in > layers that make it impossible to do some of the advanced

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Monty, * drop stevedore/plugin support. An OpenStack REST client has no need for > plugins. All services are welcome. *note below* Back to 60s style of development? Just copy paste things? no plugins? no architecture? no libs? That's not going to work for dozens of OpenStack projects. It's

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Joshua Harlow
Also note that this appears to exist: https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/blob/master/requirements.txt#L10 So even if python-openstacksdk is not a top level project, I would assume that it being a requirement would imply that it is? Or perhaps neither the

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Michael Johnson
-Original Message- From: Monty Taylor [mailto:mord...@inaugust.com] Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:53 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project Conclusion -- As I mentioned at the top, I'd been

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Melvin Hillsman
rage-quit On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 08/04/2017 03:24 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> Michael Johnson wrote: >> >>> I was wondering what is the current status of the python-openstacksdk >>> project. The Octavia team has posted some patches

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Monty Taylor
On 08/04/2017 03:24 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Michael Johnson wrote: I was wondering what is the current status of the python-openstacksdk project. The Octavia team has posted some patches implementing our new Octavia v2 API [1] in the SDK, but we have not had any reviews. I have also asked

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
Michael Johnson wrote: > I was wondering what is the current status of the python-openstacksdk > project. The Octavia team has posted some patches implementing our new > Octavia v2 API [1] in the SDK, but we have not had any reviews. I have also > asked some questions in #openstack-sdks with no

[openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-03 Thread Michael Johnson
Hi OpenStack developers, I was wondering what is the current status of the python-openstacksdk project. The Octavia team has posted some patches implementing our new Octavia v2 API [1] in the SDK, but we have not had any reviews. I have also asked some questions in #openstack-sdks with no