Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Ownership and path to schema definitions

2014-03-06 Thread David Kranz
On 03/05/2014 10:25 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:31:07 -0500 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: I think it would be a good time to have at least an initial discussion about the requirements for theses schemas and where they will live. The next step in tempest around this

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Ownership and path to schema definitions

2014-03-06 Thread Jay Pipes
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 13:55 +1030, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:31:07 -0500 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: I think it would be a good time to have at least an initial discussion about the requirements for theses schemas and where they will live. The next step in

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Ownership and path to schema definitions

2014-03-05 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi David, That is an interesting idea, I'd like to join in :-) -Original Message- From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:31 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Ownership and path to schema definitions

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Ownership and path to schema definitions

2014-03-05 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:31:07 -0500 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: I think it would be a good time to have at least an initial discussion about the requirements for theses schemas and where they will live. The next step in tempest around this is to replace the existing negative test files

[openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Ownership and path to schema definitions

2014-03-04 Thread David Kranz
Given that 1. there is an ongoing api discussion in which using json schemas is an important part 2. tempest now has a schema-based auto-generate feature for negative tests I think it would be a good time to have at least an initial discussion about the requirements for theses schemas and