Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [Tempest] Abondoned old code reviews

2016-06-02 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Thanks for feedback here.
There are not any objections, so I will drop old code reviews on Tempest queue.

Thanks
Ken Ohmichi

---


2016-05-31 23:55 GMT-07:00 Masayuki Igawa :
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Andrea Frittoli
>  wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 May 2016, 6:25 p.m. Ken'ichi Ohmichi, 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There are many patches which are not updated in Tempest review queue
>>> even if having gotten negative feedback from reviewers or jenkins.
>>> Nova team is abandoning such patches like [1].
>>> I feel it would be nice to abandone such patches which are not updated
>>> since the end of 2015.
>>> Any thoughts?
>
> +1
> I think 5 months is enough to abandon :)
>
> Best Regards,
> -- Masayuki
>
>
>>
>>
>> I don't mind either way, if you prefer abandoning them it's ok with me.
>> I rely on gerrit dashboards and IRC communication to decide which patches I
>> should review; but I understand it would be nice to remove some clutter.
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>>>
>>> [1]:
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/096112.html
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Ken Ohmichi
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [Tempest] Abondoned old code reviews

2016-06-01 Thread Masayuki Igawa
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:05 AM, Andrea Frittoli
 wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016, 6:25 p.m. Ken'ichi Ohmichi, 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are many patches which are not updated in Tempest review queue
>> even if having gotten negative feedback from reviewers or jenkins.
>> Nova team is abandoning such patches like [1].
>> I feel it would be nice to abandone such patches which are not updated
>> since the end of 2015.
>> Any thoughts?

+1
I think 5 months is enough to abandon :)

Best Regards,
-- Masayuki


>
>
> I don't mind either way, if you prefer abandoning them it's ok with me.
> I rely on gerrit dashboards and IRC communication to decide which patches I
> should review; but I understand it would be nice to remove some clutter.
>
> Andrea
>
>>
>> [1]:
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/096112.html
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ken Ohmichi
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [Tempest] Abondoned old code reviews

2016-05-31 Thread Andrea Frittoli
On Mon, 30 May 2016, 6:25 p.m. Ken'ichi Ohmichi, 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There are many patches which are not updated in Tempest review queue
> even if having gotten negative feedback from reviewers or jenkins.
> Nova team is abandoning such patches like [1].
> I feel it would be nice to abandone such patches which are not updated
> since the end of 2015.
> Any thoughts?
>

I don't mind either way, if you prefer abandoning them it's ok with me.
I rely on gerrit dashboards and IRC communication to decide which patches I
should review; but I understand it would be nice to remove some clutter.

Andrea


> [1]:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/096112.html
>
> Thanks
> Ken Ohmichi
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [Tempest] Abondoned old code reviews

2016-05-31 Thread Yaroslav Lobankov
+1! But I think we can leave patches created in 2016 and abandon others.

Regards,
Yaroslav Lobankov.

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There are many patches which are not updated in Tempest review queue
> even if having gotten negative feedback from reviewers or jenkins.
> Nova team is abandoning such patches like [1].
> I feel it would be nice to abandone such patches which are not updated
> since the end of 2015.
> Any thoughts?
>
> [1]:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/096112.html
>
> Thanks
> Ken Ohmichi
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] [qa] [Tempest] Abondoned old code reviews

2016-05-30 Thread Ken'ichi Ohmichi
Hi,

There are many patches which are not updated in Tempest review queue
even if having gotten negative feedback from reviewers or jenkins.
Nova team is abandoning such patches like [1].
I feel it would be nice to abandone such patches which are not updated
since the end of 2015.
Any thoughts?

[1]: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/096112.html

Thanks
Ken Ohmichi

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev