On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
wrote:
> 2016-12-02 5:39 GMT-08:00 Masayuki Igawa :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >> On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> >>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi QA-team,
>
> In the big-
2016-12-02 5:39 GMT-08:00 Masayuki Igawa :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi QA-team,
In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects.
On the other hand, some
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>>> Hi QA-team,
>>>
>>> In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects.
>>> On the other hand, some projects became non-active.
>>> That seems natural th
On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>> Hi QA-team,
>>
>> In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects.
>> On the other hand, some projects became non-active.
>> That seems natural thing.
>>
>> Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100%
Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi QA-team,
>
> In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects.
> On the other hand, some projects became non-active.
> That seems natural thing.
>
> Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio
> on "Project Status".
> The project ha
Hi QA-team,
In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects.
On the other hand, some projects became non-active.
That seems natural thing.
Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio
on "Project Status".
The project has became non-official since
https://review