openstack-dev] [refstack] Full list of API Tests versus
> 'OpenStack Powered' Tests
>
> On 2018-03-15 14:16:30 + (+), arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
> [...]
> > This can be submitted anonymously if you like.
>
> Anonymous submissions got disabled (and th
On 2018-03-15 14:16:30 + (+), arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote:
[...]
> This can be submitted anonymously if you like.
Anonymous submissions got disabled (and the existing set of data
from them deleted). See the announcement from a month ago for
details:
From: Waines, Greg [mailto:greg.wai...@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 9:05 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [refstack] Full list of API Tests versus
'OpenStack Powered' Tests
Re-posting this question to ‘OPENSTACK REFSTACK’,
Any guidance on what
t 6:22 PM
To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [refstack] Full list of API Tests versus 'OpenStack
Powered' Tests
I have a commercial OpenStack product that I would like to claim compliancy
with RefStack
·
Hi Greg,
Only the tests listed in the Guidelines are required to pass to get an
OpenStack Powered logo and trademark usage license from the OpenStack
Foundation (you must also use the designated sections of upstream code
specified in the Guideline documents). However vendors are strongly
· I have a commercial OpenStack product that I would like to claim
compliancy with RefStack
· Is it sufficient to claim compliance with only the “OpenStack Powered
Platform” TESTS ?
oi.e. https://refstack.openstack.org/#/guidelines
oi.e. the ~350-ish compute +
