Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Does the Ocata short cycle have an impact on planned EOL dates ?

2016-12-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-12-14 16:42:05 -0500 (-0500), David Moreau Simard wrote: > [...] >> This would lead upstream OpenStack (and downstream distros) to >> support 3 stable releases for a good while. > [...] > > We (upstream) supported stable/newton, stab

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Does the Ocata short cycle have an impact on planned EOL dates ?

2016-12-14 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-12-14 16:42:05 -0500 (-0500), David Moreau Simard wrote: [...] > This would lead upstream OpenStack (and downstream distros) to > support 3 stable releases for a good while. [...] We (upstream) supported stable/newton, stable/mitaka and stable/liberty branches concurrently for a span of ro

[openstack-dev] [release] Does the Ocata short cycle have an impact on planned EOL dates ?

2016-12-14 Thread David Moreau Simard
Hello, Typically, OpenStack releases have EOL'd approximately one year after being released [1]. Another way to look at it is that OpenStack has usually kept no more than 2 stable releases going at a time, deprecating the oldest one once the newest release was shipped. With the Ocata short cycle