Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2016-09-15 09:09:48 -0500:
> There was a change introduced to nova in newton which requires a minimum
> of netaddr 0.7.13. We've been testing with 0.7.18 from upper-constraints
> so bumping the minimum from 0.7.12 to 0.7.13 shouldn't cause any issues.
>
On 09/15/2016 09:39 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
> As I pointed out in the review, I don't think we'd need to re-release
> those things, however, I think this would cause a problem for
> stable/newton because the requirements repo doesn't have a stable/newton
> branch yet, so this min version bump
On 09/15/2016 10:30 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 09/15/2016 09:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> There was a change introduced to nova in newton which requires a minimum
>> of netaddr 0.7.13. We've been testing with 0.7.18 from upper-constraints
>> so bumping the minimum from 0.7.12 to 0.7.13
On 9/15/2016 9:30 AM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 09/15/2016 09:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There was a change introduced to nova in newton which requires a minimum
of netaddr 0.7.13. We've been testing with 0.7.18 from upper-constraints
so bumping the minimum from 0.7.12 to 0.7.13 shouldn't cause
On 09/15/2016 09:09 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> There was a change introduced to nova in newton which requires a minimum
> of netaddr 0.7.13. We've been testing with 0.7.18 from upper-constraints
> so bumping the minimum from 0.7.12 to 0.7.13 shouldn't cause any issues.
>
> The g-r change is
There was a change introduced to nova in newton which requires a minimum
of netaddr 0.7.13. We've been testing with 0.7.18 from upper-constraints
so bumping the minimum from 0.7.12 to 0.7.13 shouldn't cause any issues.
The g-r change is here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370833/
We're
