Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-24 Thread Thierry Carrez
Random comments inline Robert Collins wrote: > [...] > So I think the test should actually be something like: > Apply caution if it is not packaged AND packaging it is hard. > Things that make packaging a Python package hard: > - nonstandard build systems > - C dependencies that aren't already p

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-21 Thread Robert Collins
On 22 August 2015 at 11:50, Dave Walker wrote: > On 22 August 2015 at 00:04, Matthew Thode wrote: >> On 08/21/2015 05:59 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >>> On 22 August 2015 at 10:57, Matthew Thode wrote: Packaging for us is fairly easy, but it is annoying to have to add 5-6 deps each relea

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-21 Thread Dave Walker
On 22 August 2015 at 00:04, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 08/21/2015 05:59 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> On 22 August 2015 at 10:57, Matthew Thode wrote: >>> Packaging for us is fairly easy, but it is annoying to have to add 5-6 >>> deps each release, (which means we are adding cruft over time). >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-21 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/21/2015 05:59 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 22 August 2015 at 10:57, Matthew Thode wrote: >> Packaging for us is fairly easy, but it is annoying to have to add 5-6 >> deps each release, (which means we are adding cruft over time). > > We're adding functionality by bringing in existing impl

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-21 Thread Robert Collins
On 22 August 2015 at 10:57, Matthew Thode wrote: > Packaging for us is fairly easy, but it is annoying to have to add 5-6 > deps each release, (which means we are adding cruft over time). We're adding functionality by bringing in existing implementations. Surely thats better than reinventing *eve

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-21 Thread Matthew Thode
On 08/21/2015 04:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-08-20 15:24:03 +1200: >> We currently have a test where we ask if things are packaged in >> distros. >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/README.rst#n268 >> >> I think we should mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-21 Thread Robert Collins
On 22 August 2015 at 09:08, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-08-20 15:24:03 +1200: >> We currently have a test where we ask if things are packaged in >> distros. >> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/README.rst#n268 >> >> I think we shou

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-21 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-08-20 15:24:03 +1200: > We currently have a test where we ask if things are packaged in > distros. > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/README.rst#n268 > > I think we should modify that, in two ways. > > The explanation for th

[openstack-dev] [requirements] modifying the 'is it packaged' test

2015-08-19 Thread Robert Collins
We currently have a test where we ask if things are packaged in distros. http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/requirements/tree/README.rst#n268 I think we should modify that, in two ways. The explanation for the question ignores a fairly large audience of deployers who don't wait for distribu