On 2014-07-17 09:37, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 07/16/2014 10:30 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 July 2014 14:07, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer
Agreed.
And we should keep records for each release.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
As we approach Juno-3, a number of specs have been correctly marked as
abandoned since they are not expected to be ready in time for the release.
Is there a mechanism to
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:30:56PM +0100, John Garbutt wrote:
My intention was that once the specific project is open for K specs,
people will restore their original patch set, and move the spec to the
K directory, thus keeping all the history.
For Nova, the open reviews, with a -2, are ones
On 07/16/2014 10:30 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
On 16 July 2014 14:07, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer lists along
with losing a place to continue
As we approach Juno-3, a number of specs have been correctly marked as
abandoned since they are not expected to be ready in time for the release.
Is there a mechanism to keep these specs open for discussion even though there
is no expectation that they will be ready for Juno and 'defer' them to
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
As we approach Juno-3, a number of specs have been correctly marked
as abandoned since they are not expected to be ready in time for the
release.
Is there a mechanism to keep these specs open for discussion even
though there is no
Le 16/07/2014 14:09, Daniel P. Berrange a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
As we approach Juno-3, a number of specs have been correctly marked
as abandoned since they are not expected to be ready in time for the
release.
Is there a mechanism to keep these
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer lists along
with losing a place to continue the discussions even if we are not
expecting to see code in Juno.
Agreed, that is sub-optimal to say the
On 16 July 2014 14:07, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer lists along
with losing a place to continue the discussions even if we are not
expecting
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:30 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 16 July 2014 14:07, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:57:33AM +, Tim Bell wrote:
It seems a pity to archive the comments and reviewer lists along
10 matches
Mail list logo
