>> 2) Should this also be sent to centos-devel folks so that they don't
>> upgrade/update the pyopenssl in their distro repos until the issue
>> is resolved ?
>
>
> I think let's give the upstream issues a little while to play-out,
> then we decide our next steps around use of the library based on
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> Note; I haven't finished debugging the glusterfs job yet. This
> relates to the OOM that started happening on Centos after we moved to
> using as much pip-packaging as possible. glusterfs was still failing
> even before this.
>
Cool, and its
Note; I haven't finished debugging the glusterfs job yet. This
relates to the OOM that started happening on Centos after we moved to
using as much pip-packaging as possible. glusterfs was still failing
even before this.
On 04/01/2015 07:58 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
1) So why did this happen on
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On 03/27/2015 08:47 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
>
>> But how come that same recent pyOpenSSL doesn't consume more memory on
>> Ubuntu?
>>
>
> Just to loop back on the final status of this ...
>
> pyOpenSSL 0.14 does seem to use about an order of magn
On 03/27/2015 08:47 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
But how come that same recent pyOpenSSL doesn't consume more memory on Ubuntu?
Just to loop back on the final status of this ...
pyOpenSSL 0.14 does seem to use about an order of magnitude more
memory than 0.13 (2mb -> 20mb). For details see [1].
Thi
On 03/27/2015 08:47 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
But how come that same recent pyOpenSSL doesn't consume more memory
on Ubuntu?
Because we don't use it in CI; I believe the packaged version is
installed before devstack runs on our ubuntu CI vm's. It's probably a
dependency of some base package there,
> I'll spend a bit more time on this -- I haven't determined if it's
> centos or swift specific yet -- but in the mean-time, beware of
> recent pyOpenSSL
But how come that same recent pyOpenSSL doesn't consume more memory on Ubuntu?
Alan
_
On 03/26/2015 04:07 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> See [1] for some more details; but the short story is that the various
> swift processes -- even just sitting around freshly installed from
> devstack before anything happens -- take up twice as much space on
> centos as ubuntu
>
> --- swift (% total sy
Hi,
We've been having an issue with Centos 7 jobs and the host running
out of memory. After some investigation; one likely angle seems to be
the memory usage by swift.
See [1] for some more details; but the short story is that the various
swift processes -- even just sitting around freshly inst
