Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-12 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Doesn't InfluxDB do the same? InfluxDB stores timeseries data primarily. Gnocchi in intended to store strongly-typed OpenStack resource representations (instance, images, etc.) in addition to providing a means to access timeseries data associated with those resources. So to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Brad Topol
Subject:[openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project Folks, It's come to our attention that some key individuals are not fully up-to-date on gnocchi activities, so it being a good and healthy thing to ensure we're as communicative as possible about our roadmap

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Glynn egl...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 08/06/2014 11:17 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project Folks, It's come to our attention that some key

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Sandy Walsh
From: Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 08/06/2014 11:17 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project Folks, It's come to our attention that some

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Eoghan Glynn
...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 08/06/2014 11:17 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project Folks, It's come to our attention that some key

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Sandy Walsh
From: Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 08/06/2014 11:17 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project Folks, It's come to our attention that some

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On 2014-08-11 5:13 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote: Right, I'm not suggesting to remove the storage abstraction layer. I'm just curious what gnocchi does better/different than InfluxDB? I was at the OpenStack Design Summit when Gnocchi was presented. Soon after the basic goals and technical details of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Eoghan Glynn
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Hi Eoghan, Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many folks feel that this technology is a viable solution for the problem space

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-11 Thread Sandy Walsh
On 8/11/2014 6:49 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Hi Eoghan, Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does not cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged. Many folks feel that this technology is a viable

[openstack-dev] [tc][ceilometer] Some background on the gnocchi project

2014-08-06 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Folks, It's come to our attention that some key individuals are not fully up-to-date on gnocchi activities, so it being a good and healthy thing to ensure we're as communicative as possible about our roadmap, I've provided a high-level overview here of our thinking. This is intended as a