Sounds great. Going to get a cold beer to celebrate that ;)
Witek
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Danjou
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Juni 2018 16:51
> To: Bedyk, Witold
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [open
On Fri, Jun 22 2018, Bedyk, Witold wrote:
> You've said lacking manpower is currently the main issue in Ceilometer which
> stops you from accepting new publishers and that you don't want to add
> maintenance overhead.
>
> We're offering help on maintaining the project.
Oh cool, I misunderstood.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018, Bedyk, Witold wrote:
You've said lacking manpower is currently the main issue in
Ceilometer which stops you from accepting new publishers and that
you don't want to add maintenance overhead.
I've lost track of the details of the thread, can you remind me why
keeping the
> Sent: Freitag, 22. Juni 2018 15:48
> To: Bedyk, Witold
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][monasca] Monasca
> publisher for Ceilometer
>
> On Fri, Jun 22 2018, Bedyk, Witold wro
On Fri, Jun 22 2018, Bedyk, Witold wrote:
> I know it's not how it normally works, but in that case it seems to be a clear
> win-win situation.
I'm sorry, I really don't see what's the win for Ceilometer or its
developer. Could you elaborate?
--
Julien Danjou
;; Free Software hacker
;;
lopment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][monasca] Monasca
> publisher for Ceilometer
>
> On Wed, Jun 20 2018, Bedyk, Witold wrote:
>
> Hi Witek,
>
> It's not a transparency issue. It's a manpowe
gt;> -Original Message-
>> From: Julien Danjou
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2018 14:07
>> To: Bedyk, Witold
>> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][monasca] Mon
Witold
> Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][monasca] Monasca
> publisher for Ceilometer
>
> On Wed, Jun 20 2018, Bedyk, Witold wrote:
>
> Same as Gordon. You should maintain that in your o
-Original Message-
>> From: Bedyk, Witold
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 10:28
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][monasca] Monasca
>> publisher for Ceilometer
>>
Hello Telemetry Team,
any opinion on this?
Best greetings
Witek
> -Original Message-
> From: Bedyk, Witold
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 10:28
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer
Hello Telemetry Team,
We would like to contribute a Monasca publisher to Ceilometer project [1] and
add it to the list of currently supported transports [2].
The goal of the plugin is to send Ceilometer samples to Monasca API.
I understand Gordon's concerns about adding maintenance overhead for
11 matches
Mail list logo
