Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] FYI, the tripleo-ui package is currently broken

Thanks for being on top of this, Julie. Honza Pokorny On 2017-01-19 15:17, Julie Pichon wrote: > On 18 January 2017 at 11:35, Julie Pichon wrote: > > I'm sorry to report we're finding ourselves in the same situation > > again - CI will fail on all the UI patches, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] FYI, the tripleo-ui package is currently broken

On 18 January 2017 at 11:35, Julie Pichon wrote: > I'm sorry to report we're finding ourselves in the same situation > again - CI will fail on all the UI patches, please don't recheck until > we have a new dependencies package available. > > On the plus side, with the help of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] FYI, the tripleo-ui package is currently broken

Hi all, I'm sorry to report we're finding ourselves in the same situation again - CI will fail on all the UI patches, please don't recheck until we have a new dependencies package available. On the plus side, with the help of amoralej on #rdo we figured out why this is happening: the tripleo-ui

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] FYI, the tripleo-ui package is currently broken

On 9 January 2017 at 13:20, Julie Pichon wrote: > On 6 January 2017 at 14:52, Julie Pichon wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Just a heads-up that the DLRN "current"/dev package for the Tripleo UI >> is broken in Ocata and will cause the UI to only show a blank

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] FYI, the tripleo-ui package is currently broken

On 6 January 2017 at 14:52, Julie Pichon wrote: > Hi folks, > > Just a heads-up that the DLRN "current"/dev package for the Tripleo UI > is broken in Ocata and will cause the UI to only show a blank page, > until we resolve some dependencies issues within the -deps package. >

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] FYI, the tripleo-ui package is currently broken

Hi folks, Just a heads-up that the DLRN "current"/dev package for the Tripleo UI is broken in Ocata and will cause the UI to only show a blank page, until we resolve some dependencies issues within the -deps package. If I understand correctly, we ended up with an incomplete package because we