Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-07-05 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 07/04/2016 01:42 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi Dmitry, > > > > I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces > > are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around > > the naming

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-07-05 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 07/04/2016 01:42 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: Hi Dmitry, I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around the naming (specifically for the "provide" action): On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-07-04 Thread Sanjay Upadhyay
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces > are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around > the naming (specifically for the "provide" action): > > On Thu, May

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-07-04 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi Dmitry, I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around the naming (specifically for the "provide" action): On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > The last step before the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-23 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 05/21/2016 08:35 PM, Dan Prince wrote: On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 14:06 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 05/20/2016 01:44 PM, Dan Prince wrote: On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:31 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/3 0020 0/ about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-21 Thread Dan Prince
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 14:06 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 05/20/2016 01:44 PM, Dan Prince wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:31 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/3 > > > 0020 > > > 0/ > > > about

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-20 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 05/20/2016 03:42 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: On 05/19/2016 09:31 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300200/ about the future of node management (registering, configuring and introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's more

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-20 Thread John Trowbridge
On 05/19/2016 09:31 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300200/ > about the future of node management (registering, configuring and > introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's more fair (and > convenient) to move it here.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-20 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 05/20/2016 02:54 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: Hi Dmitry, Thanks for the detailed write-up, some comments below: On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: what do you propose? I would like the new TripleO mistral workflows to start following the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-20 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi Dmitry, Thanks for the detailed write-up, some comments below: On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > what do you propose? > > > I would like the new TripleO mistral workflows to start following the ironic > state machine closer. Imagine the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-20 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 05/20/2016 01:44 PM, Dan Prince wrote: On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:31 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi all! We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30020 0/ about the future of node management (registering, configuring and introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-20 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, > This sounds like an Ironic bug to me. Cleaning (wiping a disk) and > removing state that would break subsequent installations on a different > drive are different things. In TripleO I think the reason we disable > cleaning is largely because of the extra time it takes and the fact > that

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-20 Thread Dan Prince
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:31 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30020 > 0/  > about the future of node management (registering, configuring and  > introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's more fair (and  > convenient)

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Nodes management in our shiny new TripleO API

2016-05-19 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi all! We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300200/ about the future of node management (registering, configuring and introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's more fair (and convenient) to move it here. The goal is to fix several long-standing design flaws