On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 07/04/2016 01:42 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> > I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces
> > are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around
> > the naming
On 07/04/2016 01:42 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces
are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around
the naming (specifically for the "provide" action):
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces
> are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around
> the naming (specifically for the "provide" action):
>
> On Thu, May
Hi Dmitry,
I wanted to revisit this thread, as I see some of these interfaces
are now posted for review, and I have a couple of questions around
the naming (specifically for the "provide" action):
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> The last step before the
On 05/21/2016 08:35 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 14:06 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
On 05/20/2016 01:44 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:31 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi all!
We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/3
0020
0/
about the
On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 14:06 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 01:44 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:31 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all!
> > >
> > > We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/3
> > > 0020
> > > 0/
> > > about
On 05/20/2016 03:42 PM, John Trowbridge wrote:
On 05/19/2016 09:31 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi all!
We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300200/
about the future of node management (registering, configuring and
introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's more
On 05/19/2016 09:31 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300200/
> about the future of node management (registering, configuring and
> introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's more fair (and
> convenient) to move it here.
On 05/20/2016 02:54 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the detailed write-up, some comments below:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
what do you propose?
I would like the new TripleO mistral workflows to start following the
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the detailed write-up, some comments below:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:31:36PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> what do you propose?
>
>
> I would like the new TripleO mistral workflows to start following the ironic
> state machine closer. Imagine the
On 05/20/2016 01:44 PM, Dan Prince wrote:
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:31 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi all!
We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30020
0/
about the future of node management (registering, configuring and
introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's
Hi,
> This sounds like an Ironic bug to me. Cleaning (wiping a disk) and
> removing state that would break subsequent installations on a different
> drive are different things. In TripleO I think the reason we disable
> cleaning is largely because of the extra time it takes and the fact
> that
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 15:31 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30020
> 0/
> about the future of node management (registering, configuring and
> introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's more fair (and
> convenient)
Hi all!
We started some discussions on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300200/
about the future of node management (registering, configuring and
introspecting) in the new API, but I think it's more fair (and
convenient) to move it here. The goal is to fix several long-standing
design flaws
14 matches
Mail list logo