Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ocata specs

2016-11-02 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 05:46:48PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 01/11/16 15:13, James Slagle wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > TripleO (like some other projects in OpenStack) have not always done > > > good job in merging

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ocata specs

2016-11-01 Thread John Dickinson
On 1 Nov 2016, at 14:46, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 01/11/16 15:13, James Slagle wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> TripleO (like some other projects in OpenStack) have not always done >>> good job in merging specs on time during a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ocata specs

2016-11-01 Thread Zane Bitter
On 01/11/16 15:13, James Slagle wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hi, TripleO (like some other projects in OpenStack) have not always done good job in merging specs on time during a cycle. I would like to make progress on this topic and for that,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ocata specs

2016-11-01 Thread James Slagle
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hi, > > TripleO (like some other projects in OpenStack) have not always done > good job in merging specs on time during a cycle. > I would like to make progress on this topic and for that, I propose we > set a deadline to

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Ocata specs

2016-11-01 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi, TripleO (like some other projects in OpenStack) have not always done good job in merging specs on time during a cycle. I would like to make progress on this topic and for that, I propose we set a deadline to get a spec approved for Ocata release. This deadline would be Ocata-1 which is week