On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 08:18 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>
>> Even if I was part of those who approved this feature, I still have
>> some comments, inline:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Alex Schultz
On 11/22/2016 08:18 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
Even if I was part of those who approved this feature, I still have
some comments, inline:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Even if I was part of those who approved this feature, I still have
some comments, inline:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/21/2016 05:26 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>
> On 11/21/2016 05:26 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a POC patch[1] up to demonstrate the use of the tripleo-repos
On 11/21/2016 05:26 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Hi,
I have a POC patch[1] up to demonstrate the use of the tripleo-repos tool
[2] as a replacement for most of tripleo.sh --repo-setup. It has now passed
all of the CI jobs
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a POC patch[1] up to demonstrate the use of the tripleo-repos tool
> [2] as a replacement for most of tripleo.sh --repo-setup. It has now passed
> all of the CI jobs so I wanted to solicit some feedback.
>
Hi,
I have a POC patch[1] up to demonstrate the use of the tripleo-repos
tool [2] as a replacement for most of tripleo.sh --repo-setup. It has
now passed all of the CI jobs so I wanted to solicit some feedback.
There are a few changes related to repo naming because the tool names
repo