Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)

On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 23:24 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: > > > > This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. > > Talking > > about upstream is great but I suppose I'd rather debate major > > changes > > after we branch

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016, at 05:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > Doing this in 3rd party ci I think simplyfies things because we'll no > longer need a public cloud and as a result the security measures > requeired to avoid putting cloud credentials on the jenkins slaves > wont be needed. Just a word of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 03/21/2016 03:52 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:57:53AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 03/21/2016 07:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >>> On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Ben Nemec wrote: On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-10

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:57:53AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/21/2016 07:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > > On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Ben Nemec wrote: > >> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 2016-03-21 10:57:53 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote: [...] > So I'm not sure this is actually a step away from gating all the > projects. In fact, since we can't vote today as part of the integrated > gate, and I believe that would continue to be the case until we could > run entirely in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 03/21/2016 07:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: >>> This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking >>> about upstream is great but I suppose I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:59:22AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: > >> This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking > >> about upstream is great but I suppose I'd rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 03/17/2016 01:13 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:59:22AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: >> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: >> This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking >> about upstream is great but I suppose I'd rather debate major changes >> after we branch Mitaka. :/ > [...] > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:55:24PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > On 03/17/2016 01:13 PM, Paul Belanger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:59:22AM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > >> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)

On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote: > This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking > about upstream is great but I suppose I'd rather debate major changes > after we branch Mitaka. :/ [...] I didn't mean to pile on TripleO, nor did I intend to imply

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)

On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 13:45 -0500, Paul Belanger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:32:15PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > > On 2016-03-10 09:50:03 -0500 (-0500), Emilien Macchi wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > OpenStack Infra provides an easy way to plug CI systems and some > > > CIs (Nova,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)

This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking about upstream is great but I suppose I'd rather debate major changes after we branch Mitaka. :/ Anyways, might as well get into it now. replies inline On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 17:32 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:32:15PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-10 09:50:03 -0500 (-0500), Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > > OpenStack Infra provides an easy way to plug CI systems and some > > CIs (Nova, Neutron, Cinder, etc) already gate on some third party > > systems. I was

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] becoming third party CI (was: enabling third party CI)

On 2016-03-10 09:50:03 -0500 (-0500), Emilien Macchi wrote: [...] > OpenStack Infra provides an easy way to plug CI systems and some > CIs (Nova, Neutron, Cinder, etc) already gate on some third party > systems. I was wondering if we would not be interested to > investigate this area and maybe ask