Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-08-16 Thread Derek Higgins
On 19 July 2017 at 17:02, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 17 July 2017 at 15:56, Derek Higgins wrote: >> On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-19 Thread Derek Higgins
On 17 July 2017 at 15:56, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-17 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Michele Baldessari wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 02:23:25PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 >> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-17 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 17/07/17 15:56 +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 12 July 2017 at 22:33,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-17 Thread Derek Higgins
On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-17 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: >> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-13 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> [...] >>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-13 Thread Derek Higgins
On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] >> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 >> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it >> would

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-13 Thread Derek Higgins
On 12 July 2017 at 22:23, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hey folks, > > Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it > would work with multinode jobs. The idea was that we would create a libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-13 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 12/07/17 14:23 -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: Hey folks, Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it would work with multinode jobs. Also, Flavio would like to test k8s on scenario006:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-12 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: [...] > Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 > (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it > would work with multinode jobs. Derek, I also would like to point out that

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

2017-07-12 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hey folks, Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it would work with multinode jobs. Also, Flavio would like to test k8s on scenario006: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471759/ . To avoid having too much