I've been thinking about this a bit, and had some ideas. Take the
following as points for thought, rather than my saying "this is what we
should do".
How about each Trove participant be assigned a core mentor. This way,
each non-core person knows who they can ask for information about how
O
Hi Mat:
Some answers, and my perspective, are inline:
Lowery, Mathew writes:
> As a non-core, I would like to understand the process by which core
> prioritizes Gerrit changes.
I'm not aware of any standard process used by all core reviewers to
prioritize reviewing changes in Gerrit. My proces
As a non-core, I would like to understand the process by which core prioritizes
Gerrit changes. I'd also like to know any specific criteria used for approval.
If such a process was transparent and followed consistently, wouldn't that
eliminate the need for "Hey core, can you review ?" in IRC?
S
