Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-17 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Apr 16 2015, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: /me put his wsme-core hat on * Should projects relying on WSME start thinking about migrating their APIs to another technology? Maybe not migrating, but at least not starting something new with it. * Can we somehow get the core team to start

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-17 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Apr 16 2015, Jay Pipes wrote: I think this may be the way to go. The intent of WSME is admirable (the multiprotocol stack) but the execution leads to unwarranted complexity. I think a framework more specifically dedicated to JSON APIs, or even just being webby and correct would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-17 Thread Chris Dent
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Julien Danjou wrote: After using Pecan for a while, I'm leaning toward explicit routing too. This Falcon API looks right too. Honestly Pecan is messy. Most of the time, when coding, you have no clue which one of the method is going to be picked in which controller class.

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-17 Thread Julien Danjou
On Fri, Apr 17 2015, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: Apparently not. But it would be good to get some bugs fixed in WSME before we come up with a final solution within each OpenStack project: Whether keep WSME or migrate to something else since it requires time. You are now both members of

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-17 Thread Chris Dent
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: /me also deliberately volunteers cdent to wsme core :-) Feh. I suppose since most of the recent code and conversation has been you and me, that makes sense. If people agree, I'm happy to participate, but only if you're there too. That's only

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-17 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: /me also deliberately volunteers cdent to wsme core :-) Feh. I suppose since most of the recent code and conversation has been you and me, that makes sense. If people agree, I'm happy to participate, but only if you're there too. That's only

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-17 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, * Should projects relying on WSME start thinking about migrating their APIs to another technology? Maybe not migrating, but at least not starting something new with it. Oh no, FWIW I don't even consider starting something new as a valid option here. Err, yeah, right. There are 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-17 Thread Chris K
Hello, No need to do that, I'm OK to add any competent people to wsme-core. :) While I don't have a great deal of experience with the WSME code base (other then being a user of it), As Ironic is currently using WSME I would offer to help. As a core on Ironic I would continue to expect that to

[openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-16 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, We have a couple of Openstack projects that uses WSME for their REST APIs[1], but WSME project looks abandoned. The review stats are not good, for the last 40 days the project didn't have a single review from a core reviewer[2], the bugs are not being triaged nor fixed [3], I have been trying

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-16 Thread Monty Taylor
On 04/16/2015 07:41 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: Hi, We have a couple of Openstack projects that uses WSME for their REST APIs[1], but WSME project looks abandoned. The review stats are not good, for the last 40 days the project didn't have a single review from a core reviewer[2], the

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-16 Thread Chris Dent
On 04/16/2015 07:41 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: We have a couple of Openstack projects that uses WSME for their REST APIs[1], but WSME project looks abandoned. The review stats are not good, for the last 40 days the project didn't have a single review from a core reviewer[2], the bugs are not

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

2015-04-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/16/2015 12:45 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On 04/16/2015 07:41 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: * Should projects relying on WSME start thinking about migrating their APIs to another technology? I think this may be the way to go. The intent of WSME is admirable (the multiprotocol stack) but the