Hi, Rob,
Appreciate your suggestions. Please see my inline comments.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Robert Putt
wrote:
> For me the important things are:
>
>
>
> a) Sandboxed code in some container solution
>
Yeah, it's on the roadmap (may happen in several days.)
> b) Pluggable
2017 at 10:56 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FaaS] Introduce a FaaS project
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Sam P
mailto:sam47pr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Larry,
Thank you for the details.
I am interested and
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Sam P wrote:
> Hi Larry,
> Thank you for the details.
> I am interested and like the idea of no vendor/platform lock-in.
>
> However, I still have this stupid question in me.
> Why FaaS need to be in the OpenStack ecosystem? Can it survive
> outside and still
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Li Ma wrote:
> Do you have submitted a proposal to create this project under
> OpenStack umbrella?
>
Yeah, as the first step: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463953/
Cheers,
Lingxian Kong (Larry)
Hi Larry,
Thank you for the details.
I am interested and like the idea of no vendor/platform lock-in.
However, I still have this stupid question in me.
Why FaaS need to be in the OpenStack ecosystem? Can it survive
outside and still be able to integrate with OpenStack?
This FaaS must able to
That's interesting. Serverless is a general computing engine that can
brings lots of possibility of how to make use of resource managed by
OpenStack. I'd like to see a purely OpenStack-powered solution there.
Do you have submitted a proposal to create this project under
OpenStack umbrella?
On Mon
Yes, I am recreating the wheels :-)
I am sending this email not intend to say Qinling[1] project is a better
option than others as a project of function as a service, I just provide
another
possibility for developers/operators already in OpenStack world, and try my
luck to seek people who have the