[openstack-dev] [fuel] time to retire (parts of) fuel?

I see that many repos have not seen any merges for fuel. Do you want to retire at least parts of it? We have many bitrot jobs for fuel set up and people proposing jobs against it that get no reaction - so, I suggest to make it's state clear. I see some changes in fuel-devops - but the rest

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] stable branches maintenance

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:48:00PM +0300, Denis Meltsaykin wrote: > Greetings everyone! > > Since the development of fuel-related projects is currently not so active > as it used to be, I want to propose a change in how we maintain stable > branches. > > -Motivation- > As for now to commit

[openstack-dev] [fuel] stable branches maintenance

Greetings everyone! Since the development of fuel-related projects is currently not so active as it used to be, I want to propose a change in how we maintain stable branches. -Motivation- As for now to commit anything into a stable branch of a fuel-related project one should get at least one

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting April 20th is cancelled

Fuelers Agenda is empty for today, so the meeting is cancelled. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting April 6th is cancelled

Fuelers Agenda is empty for today, so the meeting is cancelled. -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis, Inc. +7 (495) 640-49-04 +7 (926) 702-39-68 Skype kuklinvv 35bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str. Moscow, Russia, www.mirantis.com www.mirantis.ru

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Stable/newton Temporary Code Freeze

Fuelers As for preparing for 10.1 release of Fuel, there is a temporary code freeze for stable/newton branch until further announcement. Please do not merge any code except the one with +2 from me. I will write a separate email when the freeze is lifted. -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin,

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Stepping down from core team

Hey fuelers, Having not been very active in Fuel the past year I think it's time to step down from the core team. If you need my review or you want to ask something, pls feel free to ping me in IRC. Best, Ihor __

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting March 23th is cancelled

Agenda is empty for today, so I am calling the meeting as cancelled. -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis, Inc. +7 (495) 640-49-04 +7 (926) 702-39-68 Skype kuklinvv 35bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str. Moscow, Russia, www.mirantis.com

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting March 16th is cancelled

Agenda is empty for today except for review requests, so I am calliing the meeting as cancelled. -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis, Inc. +7 (495) 640-49-04 +7 (926) 702-39-68 Skype kuklinvv 35bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str. Moscow, Russia, www.mirantis.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

Thank you! On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Ihor Kalnytskyi wrote: > I'm pleased to welcome Alexander to the fuel-web core team! > > https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/664,members > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fedor Zhadaev > wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

I'm pleased to welcome Alexander to the fuel-web core team! https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/664,members On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fedor Zhadaev wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:36 AM Булат Гайфуллин > wrote: >> >> +1

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting Feb 23 is canceled

Feb 23 meeting is cancelled as majority of Fuel contributors will be on holidays that day and others are travelling. See you all next week. -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis, Inc. +7 (495) 640-49-04 +7 (926) 702-39-68 Skype kuklinvv 35bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

+1 On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:36 AM Булат Гайфуллин wrote: > +1 > > 2017-02-21 17:01 GMT+03:00 Alexey Shtokolov : > > Hey fellow fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. > He's doing thorough review [1],

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

+1 2017-02-21 17:01 GMT+03:00 Alexey Shtokolov : > Hey fellow fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. > He's doing thorough review [1], participate in feature developments > (e.g. Config-DB enhancements, network-manager

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

+1 Alexander is a great specialist >Hey fellow fuelers, >I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team.>He's doing >thorough review [1], participate in feature developments>(e.g. Config-DB >enhancements, network-manager performance improvements) and made an outstanding

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

+1 On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:32 PM Aleksey Kasatkin wrote: > +1 > > > Aleksey Kasatkin > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Ihor Kalnytskyi > wrote: > > Hey fellow fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

+1 Aleksey Kasatkin On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Ihor Kalnytskyi wrote: > Hey fellow fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. > He's doing thorough review [1], participate in feature developments > (e.g. Config-DB enhancements,

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

Hey fellow fuelers, I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. He's doing thorough review [1], participate in feature developments (e.g. Config-DB enhancements, network-manager performance improvements) and made an outstanding contribution bug-fixing. Core reviewers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][kolla][kuryr][openstack-ansible][openstack-helm] OpenStack on containers leaveraging kuryr

Flavio, Somehow the fuel project and openstack-ansible project got left off the taglines. I’m not sure if the fuel peeps saw this thread, but I know the openstack-ansible peeps didn’t see the thread. As a result, I’ve added those taglines. Hopefully we can include the broader deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][release] Opting out of Ocata?

Dims Thank you for keeping the hand on the pulse. I am going to take over the PTL duties and we are going to produce releases according to the wiki . We are going to have RC1 next week (around Feb 15). After that we are going to proceed as

[openstack-dev] [fuel][release] Opting out of Ocata?

Dear Fuel Team, There have been no releases for fuel-* projects in the Ocata time frame: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/releases/tree/deliverables/ocata Fuel projects under governance are supposed to be following the "cycle-trailing" schedule:

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting Jan 19 is canceled

Nothing is on the agenda [0] this week, so I'm calling to cancel the meeting. If you have anything to discuss please come chat in #fuel or add it to the agenda to discuss next week. [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov OpenStack Fuel PTL

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Ci] New keyword for triggering deployment tests

Hi all, please be informed that for re-triggering fuel deployment tests [1] should be used Gerrit reply with keyword 'fuel: redeploy' [2] By implementing this change, we're separating heavy and time-consuming deployment tests from other tests, which gives us much more flexible re-triggering

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meetings Dec22, Dec29 and Jan5 are cancelled

Fuelers, As we agreed next 3 meetings (Dec22, Dec29 and Jan5) are cancelled due to holidays. Please feel free to put your topics to agenda [0] for Jan12 meeting. [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov OpenStack Fuel PTL

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Weekly meeting Nov 10 is canceled

Nothing is on the agenda [0] this week, so I'm calling to cancel the meeting. If you have anything to discuss. Please come chat in #fuel or add it to the agenda to discuss next week. [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov OpenStack Fuel PTL

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][tripleo] Fuel and TripleO Cross-Project Integration

Hi, > 3. Consider integration of Fuel provisioning, network configuration and disk partitioning with Ironic and TripleO As a part of this, I'd like to propose "l23network" puppet module [0] separation from fuel-library. This would allow anyone to reuse it for software-defined network

[openstack-dev] [fuel][tripleo] Fuel and TripleO Cross-Project Integration

Stackers During OpenStack summit in Barcelona we had a rather productive cross-project integration session between Fuel and TripleO projects [0]. More precisely we discussed the following: 1. Services composition and deployment workflow control 2. Complex networking configuration (bonds,

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugin]Add multiple backends support

pate in a Usability Study at Barcelona: Get a free bluetooth speaker and OpenStack t-shirt for your time (Kruithof Jr, Pieter) 4. What do customers want?: Six studies conducted by the OpenStack UX project on behalf of the community (Kruithof Jr, Pieter) 5. Re: [heat] Rolling Upgrade

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Fuel][Plugin]

nal fields with +/- signs and > the data provided is used by plugin" > > > Kindly correct my understanding if its wrong, do we have capability to add > a text field by pressing +/- ? > > What capability do we have with Fuel UI to add fields dynamically today ? > > >

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Fuel][Plugin]

do we have with Fuel UI to add fields dynamically today ? I have read https://openstack.nimeyo.com/44264/openstack-dev-fuel-interaction-between-fuel-plugin-and-fuel [openstack-dev] [Fuel] interaction between fuel-plugin and fuel-UI - OpenStack Mailing List Archive<https://openstack.nimeyo.com/44

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Weekly meetings for 10/20 and 10/27 are canceled

Fuelers, Due to preparation to the upcoming summit and our summit sessions [0] We decided to cancel this week and next week's Fuel IRC meetings. [0] - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-ocata-summit-planning --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov Fuel PTL

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Contributing a new fuel-plugin

Hi Omar You might want to follow basic OpenStack documentation here: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html if you want to create a new project. For fuel plugins just put it into fuel namespace and call it something like 'fuel-plugin-'. If you want to contribute to the existing

[openstack-dev] [FUEL]Fuel-devops 3.0.3 release

Hello! Today we are releasing fuel-devops 3.0.3. Included new changes: * DevopsClient implementation - split logical layers [3] * Real-time output during SSH command execution, Subprocess runner optimization [1, 2, 6, 8, 9] * Manipulate bridges on remote hosts [13] * Use DHCP ip ranges for

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Contributing a new fuel-plugin

Please, could someone help me find the correct process on how to contribute fuel plugins upstream? I had followed these instructions but when I opened bug it was declared invalid - has the process changed perhaps? [1] I cannot find relevant documentation for how to go about creating the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Glance][Vsphere][Datastore]

This means that the glance store driver failed to lookup the datacenter configured in the vmware_datastores option of glance-api.conf . >From the official documentation for that option :- *vmware_datastores allows administrators to* *configure multiple datastores to save glance image in the

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Glance][Vsphere][Datastore]

Hi, I have a problem related to glance when i try to install Openstack Liberty using Fuel MOS8.0 on top of Vsphere: - It had problem of uploading cirros image and i found out that at that time, glance-api was not working. The error is"Datacenter reference can not be None" - Then i checked the

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Glance][Vsphere][Datastore]

Hi, I have a problem related to glance when i try to install Openstack Liberty using Fuel MOS8.0 on top of Vsphere: - It had problem of uploading cirros image and i found out that at that time, glance-api was not working. The error is "Datacenter reference can not be None" - Then i checked the

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Weekly meeting for 9/29 is canceled

The agenda [0] is empty again this week so the meeting is closed, see you again next week [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda -- Andrew Woodward Mirantis __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

o:vkozhuka...@mirantis.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:58 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO > > > > Dear colleagues, > > W

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] Is there a way to change plugin html dynamically?

Hi Peter, there are two ways I see today to have done what you want to: First, you can change [0] and add some fields to store second netapp device. In this case you'll need to change puppet manifests logic to use new fields - according to current state, it's a bunch of code double or you'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

Hi, Vladimir Any guide to install from rpm? Thanks, -Ruijing From: Vladimir Kozhukalov [mailto:vkozhuka...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:58 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: [openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] Is there a way to change plugin html dynamically?

Hi Fuel dev, I am studying the development of fuel plugin and usage of some existing plugins. I wondered is there a way to change the Plugin layout in settings page dynamically: Take netapp's plugin as the example:

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] [ptl] Announcing my candidacy for Fuel PTL in the Ocala cycle

Fuelers, I would like to announce my candidacy for Fuel PTL in the Ocata cycle. ** Introduction ** First of all, allow me to introduce myself. I joined the OpenStack Community during the Juno release cycle. I started on a "consumer" side - as a Head of IT at a media holding I was consuming and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] PTL non candidacy

Vladimir, fuelers, very impressive list of achievements for 1 release cycle. Good work, folks! Regards, Igor Marnat On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Newton cycle is getting to its end and it is time to look at what

[openstack-dev] [fuel] Meeting for today is canceled

We have nothing slated on the agenda [1] for today, so I'm calling it for the meeting. As usual, if you have anything to discuss, please raise it on the ML or in #fuel. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fuel-weekly-meeting-agenda -- Andrew Woodward Mirantis

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-virtualbox] Nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core

As there are no objections so, please welcome Serhii as he's just joined fuel-virtualbox Core Team! On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kulanov wrote: > +1 > > 2016-09-08 11:12 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Kozhukalov : > >> +1 >> >> Vladimir Kozhukalov

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

As there are no objections so, please welcome Stanislaw as he's just joined fuel-library Core Team! On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin wrote: > +1 > > > Aleksey Kasatkin > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

Sorry for being late on this. I've added Ilya to fuel-plugins-core group. Congrats, Ilya! On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > My strong +1 > > Ilya made and keeps making a great contribution to the development of Fuel > Plugins Framework > on both

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

+1 Aleksey Kasatkin On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Maksim Malchuk > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core due to > his > >

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] PTL non candidacy

Dear colleagues, Newton cycle is getting to its end and it is time to look at what we've managed to achieve by the moment. * Improved task based deployment engine (memory efficiency, code structure, graph sequences, noop run). * Re-implemented OS provisioning as a graph. Now it is one of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

+1 On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Maksim Malchuk wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core due to his > significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. He is one of the top > reviewers and contributors in the project. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

+1 On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Matthew Mosesohn wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Alexey Shtokolov > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Stanislaw made a great contribution! > > I would like to mention SSL-support, YAQL expressions for

[openstack-dev] [fuel][9.0][Deployment][Error]

Hi, I'm trying to deploy a basic three nodes architecture to test Fuel 9: 1 controller, 1storage and 1 compute nodes. After some minutes, I got this error message: Deployment has failed. All nodes are finished. Failed tasks: Task[sync_time/1], Task[sync_time/3], Task[sync_time/2] Stopping

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

+1 On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > +1 > > Stanislaw made a great contribution! > I would like to mention SSL-support, YAQL expressions for data-driven > orchestration > and his awesome live YAQL evaluator for Fuel Master node [0] > > [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

+1 Stanislaw made a great contribution! I would like to mention SSL-support, YAQL expressions for data-driven orchestration and his awesome live YAQL evaluator for Fuel Master node [0] [0] https://github.com/sorrowless/fuyaql --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov Fuel Development Lead On Thu, Sep 8, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

My strong +1 Ilya made and keeps making a great contribution to the development of Fuel Plugins Framework on both sides (nailgun and plugins) especially during the Newton release cycle! --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov Fuel Development Lead On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

+1 Aleksey Kasatkin On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Sergey Vasilenko wrote: > +1 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

+1 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

+1 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Hey Fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Ilya for joining fuel-plugins-core group. He's a > top contributor by both reviews [1] and commits [2] over the past > release cycle. Fuel cores, please share your votes. > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

+1 On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Alexey Stepanov wrote: > +1 > Best regards, > Alexey Stepanov. > > чт, 8 сент. 2016 г., 12:19 Bulat Gaifullin : > >> +1 >> >> Regards, >> Bulat Gaifullin >> Mirantis Inc. >> >> >> >> On 08 Sep 2016, at 12:05,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

+1 Best regards, Alexey Stepanov. чт, 8 сент. 2016 г., 12:19 Bulat Gaifullin : > +1 > > Regards, > Bulat Gaifullin > Mirantis Inc. > > > > On 08 Sep 2016, at 12:05, Georgy Kibardin wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

+1 2016-09-08 13:06 GMT+03:00 Aleksandr Didenko : > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sergey Vasilenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

+1 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sergey Vasilenko wrote: > +1 > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

+1 Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 08 Sep 2016, at 12:05, Georgy Kibardin wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky > wrote: > Hey Fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Ilya for

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

+1 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

+1 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Hey Fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Ilya for joining fuel-plugins-core group. He's a > top contributor by both reviews [1] and commits [2] over the past > release cycle. Fuel cores, please share your votes. > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-virtualbox] Nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core

+1 2016-09-08 11:12 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Kozhukalov : > +1 > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Maksim Malchuk > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core due to >> his

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

Hey Fuelers, I'd like to nominate Ilya for joining fuel-plugins-core group. He's a top contributor by both reviews [1] and commits [2] over the past release cycle. Fuel cores, please share your votes. - Igor [1] http://stackalytics.com/?module=fuel-plugins=newton=marks [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-virtualbox] Nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core

+1 Vladimir Kozhukalov On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Maksim Malchuk wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core due to > his significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. He is the second > reviewer and for the last

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

Congratuations. any plan to have fuel docker image? From: Oleg Gelbukh [mailto:ogelb...@mirantis.com] Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 4:28 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getti

[openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

Hello, I would like to nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core due to his significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. He is one of the top reviewers and contributors in the project. [1] http://stackalytics.com/?user_id=sbogatkin_type=all=all=marks=fuel-library [2]

[openstack-dev] [fuel-virtualbox] Nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core

Hello, I would like to nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core due to his significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. He is the second reviewer and for the last half of the year [2] acts as an unoficial QA in the fuel-virtualbox project. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

Congratulations, Vladimir, that's a huge step in a right direction for Fuel. -- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'm glad to announce that we have working BVT jobs on Fuel CI that do not >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

Dear colleagues, I'm glad to announce that we have working BVT jobs on Fuel CI that do not use ISO but instead deploy Fuel admin node from packages onto vanilla Centos 7. Please take a look at [1]. There are jobs '10.0.repos.*' [2], [3], [4]. We continue to work on re-implementing review jobs

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (3.0.2)

Hi all! We are gong to release fuel-devops framework version 3.0.2. This thread is in active development. Changes since 3.0.1: - Do not print `k e y s` if no environments registered (Bug #1605599) [1] - Extend _ManageSSH docstring with a note for current directory [2] - Fix documentation about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

Hi, -1 to the proposal. We have the ability (and we use it) to add guys to several core groups. So, AFAIC, Vladimir's pros point #1 is covered. IMO, pros point #2 looks questionable and not so important. Cons could be worse (agree with Lukasz). Thanks, Aleksey Kasatkin On Tue, Sep 6, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

Hi, Fuel repositories include several languages/technologies (puppet, python, ruby, make ...) Core engineer nominated for achievements in one project may have average skills in another language/technology. So, I give '-1' the suggestion. However, we may have one group for python project, one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

Hi, -1 for the proposal Regards, Alex On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Alexey Stepanov wrote: > Guys, I have one serious question: WHO will be global core? > Example: > I'm core reviewer in 2 repos, but I'm absolutely could not be core > reviewer in puppet! > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

Guys, I have one serious question: WHO will be global core? Example: I'm core reviewer in 2 repos, but I'm absolutely could not be core reviewer in puppet! On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > -1 for the proposal. I see no problems to add guys who're

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

-1 for the proposal. I see no problems to add guys who're familiar with various sub-projects to multiple core groups. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Evgeniy L wrote: > +1 to Lukasz. > -1 to the proposal, we had it this way for a quite some time, and it was not > good for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

+1 to Lukasz. -1 to the proposal, we had it this way for a quite some time, and it was not good for the project (as Lukasz pointed out), why should a person who merges the code to the library have an access to merge the code to Nailgun/Astute without proper expertise. Those are different areas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Andrew Maksimov wrote: > +1 > This is a good proposal, I also think we should have single fuel-core group > for all repos. In real life core reviewers won't set +2 or merge to repos > with which they are not familiar with. Actually one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

+1, I think it is good idea. Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 05 Sep 2016, at 20:17, Maksim Malchuk wrote: > > I want to clarify my previous reply > +1 > but the new fuel-core would be a small group of the cores who are fully > involved in the whole Fuel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

I want to clarify my previous reply +1 but the new fuel-core would be a small group of the cores who are fully involved in the whole Fuel project. On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Alexey Stepanov wrote: > -1 > This is seriously dangerous idea: core-reviewer in fuel-qa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

-1 This is seriously dangerous idea: core-reviewer in fuel-qa does not mean exact skills for +2/W on fuel-octane, for example. Sometimes, because of limited time, reviewer will press +W without understanding patch detail. In repo, which he knows, he can fix issue later by itself, but only of he

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

-1 My vision - we should have something like super-core group with a smaller number of the current core guys. This is because a lot of current core guys were switched to the other projects and already out of the scope. Such guys still can be cores in their former projects and can help sometimes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

+1 This is a good proposal, I also think we should have single fuel-core group for all repos. In real life core reviewers won't set +2 or merge to repos with which they are not familiar with. Regards, Andrey Maximov On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

Vladimir, as you most likely remember, we've been there already. The previous fuel-core group has been split especially due to low number of core reviewers, too big load on them and inflexibility in promoting valuable contributors into the group. Worth noting that it was very welcome change. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

Hi Vladimir, I see one big problem here - people who have expert skills in one area (for example, in fuel-library puppet manifests and their logic) will have ability to set +2 and workflow +1 to reviews in other areas (for example, in fuel-astute) where they don't have good expertise. It can lead

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

Dear colleagues, I'd like to suggest to use common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects instead of having separate independent 'by-project' core groups like 'fuel-astute-core' or 'fuel-agent-core'. Pros: 1) It will be easier to access core members (timezone and holiday tolerance) 2) It will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception for Role Decomposition patch

Thanks, Vladimir! -Dmitry. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Thanks for you efforts, FFE is granted, please go ahead. I hope we'll get > it merged by 09/09/2016. > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Dmitry Klenov

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception for Role Decomposition patch

Thanks for you efforts, FFE is granted, please go ahead. I hope we'll get it merged by 09/09/2016. Vladimir Kozhukalov On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Dmitry Klenov wrote: > Hi Fuelers, > > I would like to ask for a FFE for "Role Decomposition" feature. The spec > is

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception for Role Decomposition patch

Hi Fuelers, I would like to ask for a FFE for "Role Decomposition" feature. The spec is merged and can be fould at [0]. We were unable to land the patch [1] to Newton in time. So I would like to ask for extension till 09.09.2016 to land this patch. Changes made in the patch would introduce

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Newton Feature Freeze

Dear colleagues, I'd like to announce FF for Newton cycle. All features must be merged before 09/02/2016 12:00 AM PST. From this point all patches must refer to medium and higher bugs. If some feature patches are still in progress, please request FF exception for a respective feature. First such

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

This is so awesome! Thanks! On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM Jay Pipes wrote: > On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin > > node using online RPM repositories (not

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecating old CLI in python-fuelclient

Fuelers, We are proud to announce that we finally managed to reach the point when the old CLI in python-fuelclient (aka the old Fuel Client) can be deprecated and replaced with fuel2 — a cliff based CLI. Support of the full set of commands that are required to operate Fuel was already

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

Thank you all! I will do my best! :) 2016-08-29 15:21 GMT+03:00 Maksim Malchuk : > Although today is not the 31 Aug and we have a lack of core-reviewers in > the fuel-library I would like to speed up the process a little. > > And as there are no objections so, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

Although today is not the 31 Aug and we have a lack of core-reviewers in the fuel-library I would like to speed up the process a little. And as there are no objections so, please welcome Denis as he's just joined fuel-library Core Team! On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

Although I am not a core in fuel-library, I am voting +1. Vladimir Kozhukalov On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Ivan Berezovskiy wrote: > +1, great job! > > 2016-08-26 10:33 GMT+03:00 Bogdan Dobrelya : > >> +1 >> >> On 25.08.2016 21:08,

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

+1, great job! 2016-08-26 10:33 GMT+03:00 Bogdan Dobrelya : > +1 > > On 25.08.2016 21:08, Stanislaw Bogatkin wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Aleksandr Didenko > > > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >