Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] PTL non candidacy

2016-09-16 Thread Igor Marnat
Vladimir, fuelers, very impressive list of achievements for 1 release cycle. Good work, folks! Regards, Igor Marnat On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Newton cycle is getting to its end and it is time to look at what

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] PTL non candidacy

2016-09-13 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Dear colleagues, Newton cycle is getting to its end and it is time to look at what we've managed to achieve by the moment. * Improved task based deployment engine (memory efficiency, code structure, graph sequences, noop run). * Re-implemented OS provisioning as a graph. Now it is one of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] PTL Non-Candidacy

2016-03-14 Thread Emilien Macchi
Dmitry, thanks for your work over the last months. I would like to personally thank you because you highly contributed to the collaboration with Puppet OpenStack group, and after almost a year, we can see that as a success story. Fuel has some background because it was not part of big tent;

[openstack-dev] [fuel] PTL Non-Candidacy

2016-03-14 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
All, I will not be running for Fuel PTL for the Newton cycle. There are many reasons why I think it's a good idea for me to step down: Fuel is a large project. In Mitaka, 224 contributors made 3200+ commits changing 700K+ lines of code [0]. That's on par with the most active OpenStack projects