; understand what the state of the V2 API will be.
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> From: Vijay Venkatachalam
> Reply-To: OpenStack List
> Date: Sunday, August 10, 2014 at 2:57 PM
> To: OpenStack List
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current
>
nStack List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Sunday, August 10, 2014 at 2:57 PM
To: OpenStack List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews
Thanks Brandon for constant improvisation.
Thanks Brandon for constant improvisation.
I agree with Doug. Please update current one. We already hv more number of
reviews :-). It will be difficult to manage if we add more.
Thanks,
Vijay
Sent using CloudMagic
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Doug Wiegley
mailto:do...@a10networks.com>>
for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews
I think you should update the current reviews (new patch set, not additional
review.)
Doug
> On Aug 9, 2014, at 3:34 PM, "Brandon Logan"
> wrote:
>
> So I've done some work
I think you should update the current reviews (new patch set, not additional
review.)
Doug
> On Aug 9, 2014, at 3:34 PM, "Brandon Logan"
> wrote:
>
> So I've done some work on improving the code on the current pending
> reviews. And would like to get peoples' opinions on whether I should
>
So I've done some work on improving the code on the current pending
reviews. And would like to get peoples' opinions on whether I should
add antoher patch set to those reviews, or add the changes as as another
review dependent on the pending ones.
To be clear, no matter what the first review in t
