] Minutes from 8/13/2014 meeting
So now that is two people on this thread that are treating moving lbaas v1 to
incubator as an of course, duh kind of thing. I do not agree.
Insofar as most of neutron advanced services is feeling the velocity and
maturity pain, sure. But lbaas v2 has NO dependency
Thanks for the summary Trevor.
On 08/18/2014 01:25 PM, Trevor Vardeman wrote:
1) Discuss future of Octavia in light of Neutron-incubator project proposal.
a) There are many problems with Neutron-Incubator as currently described
Let's be specific, enumerate the problems and address them,
Agenda items are numbered, and topics, as discussed, are described beneath in
list format.
1) Discuss future of Octavia in light of Neutron-incubator project proposal.
a) There are many problems with Neutron-Incubator as currently described
b) The political happenings in Neutron leave
Hi Trevor,
thanks for sharing this minutes!
I would like to cooperate a bit to this project's developments, possibly
without ending up being just deadweight.
To this aim I have some comments inline.
Salvatore
On 18 August 2014 22:25, Trevor Vardeman trevor.varde...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hi Salvatore,
It'd be great to get your contributions in this! If you could only bring
your knowledge and experience with Neutron to the table that'd be very
beneficial. Looking forward to it.
Comments in-line
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 23:06 +0200, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Hi Trevor,
thanks
a) Most members in favor of keeping the webex meetings for the time being
Correction: most of the people that like to talk over each other in a
large voice conference voiced their approval of voice. Those that prefer
to wait for pauses to speak were unsurprisingly silent, or tried and
failed to
I agree almost completely with Brandon¹s comments on the incubator.
For Octavia, I think we need to not stress neutron vs incubator vs
spin-out, and just focus on writing some load-balancing code. We¹ve spent
far too much time in Juno working on processes, glue, and APIs, and
precious little on
I agree pretty strongly with Brandon's and Doug's comments as well.
And I did want to clarify that I certainly don't hate the Neutron cores
either. I feel like we (those working on Neutron LBaaS and the Cores) made
commitments to each other both at the Atlanta summit and the mid-cycle
hackathon,
So now that is two people on this thread that are treating moving lbaas v1
to incubator as an “of course, duh” kind of thing. I do not agree.
Insofar as most of neutron advanced services is feeling the velocity and
maturity pain, sure. But lbaas v2 has NO dependency on v1, it’s “stable”,
been
