to rename neutron again and imho it will make marvel look bad
to try and force it through.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Jimmy Akin
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:46:41 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron]: Neutron naming legal
I vote for “Big Giant Pencil”. We can call it BGP for short.
doug
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 2:15 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>
> I for one, have grown fond of "Mutnauq" while doing the DevStack neutron
> re-write ;)
>
>
> --
> Sean M. Collins
>
>
I for one, have grown fond of "Mutnauq" while doing the DevStack neutron
re-write ;)
--
Sean M. Collins
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
Wait... is this April's Fool?
(hard to believe project name change resulting from name clashing with a
Marvel comic character)
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> wrote:
> > We could
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> We could play words, like Quantron or Neutrum. Actually, it makes perfect
> sense to me, since the change to rename all project name references will be
> half the size of the proposed solution, and may even save us some
gt;, "OpenStack
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]: Neutron naming legal issues
On 31 March 2016 at 22:46, Jimmy Akin
<jimmya...@rambl
Let’s keep the name and wait for the movie where we all become the bad guys!
Edgar
On 3/31/16, 10:46 PM, "Jimmy Akin" wrote:
>
>Dear Neutrinos,
>
>We've been following the project for quite some time.
>To our satisfaction the project seems to have done well; the base
Jim,
Did you verify with Marvel if it's possible to keep the name and use
his hero. In that way we could be the first OpenStack project to have
one.
Victor Morales
On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 08:46 +0300, Jimmy Akin wrote:
> Dear Neutrinos,
>
> We've been following the project for quite some time.
On 04/01/16 12:38, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Alexander Kostrikov wrote:
>
>> What about Netrone?
>
> That could be a good one but it may also be a violation:
> http://www.infomoby.et/en/profile/netrone_networks_plc/64213
>
> One idea I had in my mind for a while is using
Alexander Kostrikov wrote:
What about Netrone?
That could be a good one but it may also be a violation:
http://www.infomoby.et/en/profile/netrone_networks_plc/64213
One idea I had in my mind for a while is using some alternative alphabet
for project naming.
What about Netrone?
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
wrote:
> Akihiro Motoki wrote:
>
> IIRC 'Quantum' was renamed to 'Neutron' due to the trademark issue.
>> I don't think reverting it to 'Quantum' resolves the issue.
>> When we chose a
Akihiro Motoki wrote:
IIRC 'Quantum' was renamed to 'Neutron' due to the trademark issue.
I don't think reverting it to 'Quantum' resolves the issue.
When we chose a new name, the foundation checked the legal/trademark issue,
so I think it is better to contact the OpenStack
LoL good one :)
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:47 AM Jimmy Akin wrote:
>
> Dear Neutrinos,
>
> We've been following the project for quite some time.
> To our satisfaction the project seems to have done well; the base line of
> features that were available to the networking
We should go back to our roots so it's better to rename "Neutron" to
"Nova Network".
Thanks,
Hirofumi
On 2016/04/01 15:24, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
IIRC 'Quantum' was renamed to 'Neutron' due to the trademark issue.
I don't think reverting it to 'Quantum' resolves the issue.
When we chose a new
IIRC 'Quantum' was renamed to 'Neutron' due to the trademark issue.
I don't think reverting it to 'Quantum' resolves the issue.
When we chose a new name, the foundation checked the legal/trademark issue,
so I think it is better to contact the OpenStack foundation or discuss
it in the legal-discuss
Wont that change Neutrinos to Quantum-states /Quantumites.
And not to ponder too much but [1] is just for reference, in case we would
like to avoid any future issues
[1] : http://www.quantum.com/terms/index.aspx
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>
>
> On 31
On 31 March 2016 at 22:46, Jimmy Akin wrote:
>
> Dear Neutrinos,
>
> We've been following the project for quite some time.
> To our satisfaction the project seems to have done well; the base line of
> features that were available to the networking component of OpenStack
>
Dear Neutrinos,
We've been following the project for quite some time.
To our satisfaction the project seems to have done well; the base line of
features that were available to the networking component of OpenStack
(then nova-network) has grown quite a bit and seem to have gained a
successful
18 matches
Mail list logo