Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2

2016-09-27 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 27/09/2016 01:36, Ryan Petrello wrote: > Apologies for the trouble this caused. As Dave mentioned, this change > warranted a new major version of pecan, and I missed it. I've reverted the > offending commit and re-released a new version of pecan (1.2.1) to PyPI: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2

2016-09-26 Thread Ryan Petrello
Apologies for the trouble this caused. As Dave mentioned, this change warranted a new major version of pecan, and I missed it. I've reverted the offending commit and re-released a new version of pecan (1.2.1) to PyPI:

Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2

2016-09-26 Thread Matt Riedemann
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2 I'm interested to hear how this works out. I thought upper-constraints was somehow supposed to work to p

Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2

2016-09-26 Thread Matt Riedemann
ns)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2 I'm interested to hear how this works out. I thought upper-constraints was somehow supposed to work to prevent this? Like maybe don't install a bra

Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2

2016-09-26 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-09-26 15:03:19 -0700 (-0700), Clay Gerrard wrote: [...] > I thought upper-constraints was somehow supposed to work to prevent this? > Like maybe don't install a brand new shiny upstream version on the gate > infrastructure test jobs until it passes all our tests? Prevent a fire > drill?

Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2

2016-09-26 Thread Dave McCowan (dmccowan)
to:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2 I'm interested to hear how this works out. I thought upper-constraints was somehow supposed to work to prevent this? Like maybe don't install a brand new shiny upstream version on the gate infrastr

Re: [openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2

2016-09-26 Thread Clay Gerrard
I'm interested to hear how this works out. I thought upper-constraints was somehow supposed to work to prevent this? Like maybe don't install a brand new shiny upstream version on the gate infrastructure test jobs until it passes all our tests? Prevent a fire drill? That bug was active back in

[openstack-dev] Pecan Version 1.2

2016-09-26 Thread Dave McCowan (dmccowan)
The Barbican project uses Pecan as our web framework. At some point recently, OpenStack started picking up their new version 1.2. This version [1] changed one of their APIs such that certain calls that used to return 200 now return 204. This has caused immediate problems for Barbican (our