I think that how Docs handles these changes depends largely on whether
or not we're given a track. I'm aware that we didn't get one in Paris,
and as a consequence a lot of my team felt it was difficult to get any
real work done.
Like Sean, I appreciate that it's a difficult decision, but am lo
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The OpenStack Foundation staff is considering a number of changes to the
> Design Summit format for Vancouver, changes on which we'd very much like
> to hear your feedback.
>
> The problems we are trying to solve are the fol
Tim Bell wrote:
>
> Let's ask the operators opinions too on openstack-operators mailing list.
Sure, that's my next step. I first wanted to check that this change was
fine for historic Design Summit participants. I'll follow up with
operators and also discuss it at the Ops meetup.
FWIW, the propo
On 09/01/15 15:50 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
[huge snip]
What do you think ? Could that work ? If not, do you have alternate
suggestions ?
Love it! Thanks for the thoughtful and detailed email.
Flavio
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
pgp2LB9GMnSpn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
On 10/01/15 03:26, Michael Dorman wrote:
> (X-posted to -operators.)
>
> Any thoughts on how the ops track spaces would be requested, since there
> is not a real ‘operators project’, PTL, etc.?
Based on our past events and summit survey feedback from Paris, I've
mentioned to Thierry that we prob
On 15:50 Fri 09 Jan , Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The OpenStack Foundation staff is considering a number of changes to the
> Design Summit format for Vancouver, changes on which we'd very much like
> to hear your feedback.
>
> The problems we are trying to solve are the following
Let's ask the operators opinions too on openstack-operators mailing list. There
was some duplication during the summit between the tracks but there is also a
significant operator need outside the pure code area which comes along with the
big tent tagging for projects. We need to make sure that
(X-posted to -operators.)
Any thoughts on how the ops track spaces would be requested, since there
is not a real ‘operators project’, PTL, etc.?
I assume this would come from the operators group as a whole, so probably
something we should put on the agenda at the ops meet up in March. (I’ve
a
Huge +1 from me. Thank you, Thierry.
-jay
On 01/09/2015 09:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Foundation staff is considering a number of changes to the
Design Summit format for Vancouver, changes on which we'd very much like
to hear your feedback.
The problems we are try
Inline
~sean
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
> sean roberts wrote:
>> I like it. Thank you for coming up with improvements to the
>> summit planning. One caveat on the definition of project for summit
>> space. Which projects get considered for space is always difficult. W
sean roberts wrote:
> I like it. Thank you for coming up with improvements to the
> summit planning. One caveat on the definition of project for summit
> space. Which projects get considered for space is always difficult. Who
> is going to fill the rooms they request or are they going to have them
I like it. Thank you for coming up with improvements to the
summit planning. One caveat on the definition of project for summit
space. Which projects get considered for space is always difficult. Who is
going to fill the rooms they request or are they going to have them mostly
empty? I'm sure the T
On 01/09/2015 09:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> What do you think ? Could that work ? If not, do you have alternate
> suggestions ?
This seems incorporate more of what people have found incredibly useful
(work sessions) and organizes things in a way to accommodate the
anticipated growth in project
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Foundation staff is considering a number of changes to the
Design Summit format for Vancouver, changes on which we'd very much like
to hear your feedback.
The problems we are trying to solve are the following:
- Accommodate the needs of more "OpenStack projects"
- Reduc
14 matches
Mail list logo