21:02
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Cc:* Ali Beddah; Tim Bell
>
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system
> for OpenStack
>
>
>
> Ali Gamal,
>
>
>
> ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
&g
From: bo...@pavlovic.ru [mailto:bo...@pavlovic.ru] On Behalf Of Boris Pavlovic
Sent: 28 December 2013 21:02
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Ali Beddah; Tim Bell
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system for
OpenStack
Ali Gamal,
?
ulated ?
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ali Gamal [mailto:aga...@itsyn.com]
> *Sent:* 28 December 2013 20:31
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List
> *Cc:* Ali Beddah
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system
> for OpenStack
be accumulated ?
Tim
From: Ali Gamal [mailto:aga...@itsyn.com]
Sent: 28 December 2013 20:31
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Cc: Ali Beddah
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system for
OpenStack
On Oct 17, 2013 12:45 AM, "Boris Pavlovic"
mai
ali.bed...@gmail.com
On Oct 17, 2013 12:45 AM, "Boris Pavlovic" wrote:
> Hi Stackers,
>
>
> We are thrilled to present to you Rally, the benchmarking system for
> OpenStack.
>
>
> It is not a secret that we have performance & scaling issues and that
> OpenStack won’t scale out of box. It is also
On Oct 17, 2013 12:45 AM, "Boris Pavlovic" wrote:
> Hi Stackers,
>
>
> We are thrilled to present to you Rally, the benchmarking system for
> OpenStack.
>
>
> It is not a secret that we have performance & scaling issues and that
> OpenStack won’t scale out of box. It is also well known that if yo
It is not just the development effort but also those users who rely on tempest
to probe their production environments. If there is a second project, they'd
have to configure the endpoints, user accounts etc. in both systems.
In my view, this cannot be done at the gate, it would take too long bu
On 10/20/2013 02:36 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
There's several issues involved in doing automated regression checking
for benchmarks:
- You need a platform which is stable. Right now all our CI runs on
virtualized instances, and I don't think there's any particular
guarantee it'll be the same underl
6m 09s (non-voting)
best,
Joe
>
> Tim
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
> > Sent: 20 October 2013 21:03
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchm
On 10/20/2013 03:03 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 21 October 2013 07:36, Alex Gaynor wrote:
There's several issues involved in doing automated regression checking for
benchmarks:
- You need a platform which is stable. Right now all our CI runs on
virtualized instances, and I don't think there's
ollins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
> Sent: 20 October 2013 21:03
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system for
> OpenStack
>
> On 21 October 2013 07:36, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> > There's several
On 21 October 2013 07:36, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> There's several issues involved in doing automated regression checking for
> benchmarks:
>
> - You need a platform which is stable. Right now all our CI runs on
> virtualized instances, and I don't think there's any particular guarantee
> it'll be the
sure changes which impact performance
> are picked up early ?
>
> ** **
>
> Tim
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Boris Pavlovic [mailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com]
> *Sent:* 20 October 2013 19:34
>
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mai
extended to cover benchmarking and ensure changes which impact performance are
picked up early ?
Tim
From: Boris Pavlovic [mailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com]
Sent: 20 October 2013 19:34
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system for
Op
Hi Sean,
>> Honestly, there has been so much work done in Tempest with the stress
tests and the scenario tests in this release, and a large growing community
around those, that it doesn't make any sense to me that you put item #3 as
a non Tempest thing.
I really don't like to copy paste function
On 10/18/2013 12:17 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
John,
Actually seems like a pretty good suggestion IMO, at least something
worth some investigation and consideration before quickly discounting
it. Rather than "that's not what tempest is", maybe it's something
tempest "could do". Don't know, not
David,
Yes, that is the goal.
We should be able to get information about "how" it works, not only that it
works.
And get such interesting results:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally#How_influence_amqp_rpc_single_reply_queue_on_performance
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
---
Mirantis Inc.
O
On 10/18/2013 12:17 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
John,
Actually seems like a pretty good suggestion IMO, at least something
worth some investigation and consideration before quickly discounting
it. Rather than "that's not what tempest is", maybe it's something
tempest "could do". Don't know, n
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> John,
>
> Actually seems like a pretty good suggestion IMO, at least something worth
> some investigation and consideration before quickly discounting it. Rather
> than "that's not what tempest is", maybe it's something tempest "could do"
John,
Actually seems like a pretty good suggestion IMO, at least something worth
some investigation and consideration before quickly discounting it. Rather
than "that's not what tempest is", maybe it's something tempest "could do".
Don't know, not saying one way or the other, just wondering if i
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 03:32 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
>
>> Jay,
>>
>>
>> Or, alternately, just have Rally as part of Tempest.
>>
>>
>> Actually, tempest is used only to verify that cloud works properly.
>> And verification is only small part of the Rall
On 10/17/2013 03:32 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Jay,
Or, alternately, just have Rally as part of Tempest.
Actually, tempest is used only to verify that cloud works properly.
And verification is only small part of the Rally.
At this moment we are using fuel-ostf-tests, but we are going to use
t
t;>
>
> Or, alternately, just have Rally as part of Tempest.
>
> -jay
>
> From: Boris Pavlovic > <mailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com**>>
>>
>> Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>>
>> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.**openstac
Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - benchmarking system for
OpenStack
Hi Stackers,
We are thrilled to present to you Rally, the benchmarking system for
OpenStack.
It is not a secret that we have performance & scaling issues an
mailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com>>
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 3:41 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] Announce of Rally - b
Hi Stackers,
We are thrilled to present to you Rally, the benchmarking system for
OpenStack.
It is not a secret that we have performance & scaling issues and that
OpenStack won’t scale out of box. It is also well known that if you get
your super big DC (5k-15k servers) you are able to find & fi
26 matches
Mail list logo
