On 29/01/16 09:45, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
Guys,
This is important and Kilo is missing it:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179989/
Is it possible to backport it to Kilo 2015.1.3?
Currently, I am manually patching Kilo / Heat by using the following diff:
On 31 January 2016 at 18:23, Steve Baker wrote:
> On 29/01/16 09:45, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>>
>> Guys,
>>
>> This is important and Kilo is missing it:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179989/
>>
>> Is it possible to backport it to Kilo 2015.1.3?
>>
>> Currently,
Oh, that's okay... Thanks guys!:)
On 29 January 2016 at 06:39, Sergey Kraynev wrote:
> Sean, thank you for the spotting.
>
> Martinx, According to the information mentioned by Sean, we unfortunately
> can not do it :(
>
> On 29 January 2016 at 10:45, Sean M. Collins
Sean, thank you for the spotting.
Martinx, According to the information mentioned by Sean, we unfortunately
can not do it :(
On 29 January 2016 at 10:45, Sean M. Collins wrote:
> Kilo is in the "security supported" stage of the lifecycle. So no,
> that's not going to get
I see ,that it has a assigned bug. So we can process it as normal backport
(although it looks as a small enhancement). So Please just propose patch
and we will review it.
On 28 January 2016 at 23:45, Martinx - ジェームズ
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This is important and Kilo is
Kilo is in the "security supported" stage of the lifecycle. So no,
that's not going to get backported.
http://docs.openstack.org/releases/index.html
--
Sean M. Collins
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Guys,
This is important and Kilo is missing it:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179989/
Is it possible to backport it to Kilo 2015.1.3?
Currently, I am manually patching Kilo / Heat by using the following diff: