Hi,
Le 18/06/2015 15:44, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're
already running (unit) tests using Python 3.5. Some have failures: I
could see issues in ceilometerclient
On 21/06/15 01:32, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Dave Walker's message of 2015-06-20 14:05:48 +0100:
On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5
is an ecosystem question IMO, not an upstream one. 3.4 and 3.5 are
v
Excerpts from Dave Walker's message of 2015-06-20 14:05:48 +0100:
> On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>
> >
> > > Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5
> > > is an ecosystem question IMO, not an upstream one. 3.4 and 3.5 are
> > > very similar when you
On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, "Doug Hellmann" wrote:
>
> > Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5
> > is an ecosystem question IMO, not an upstream one. 3.4 and 3.5 are
> > very similar when you consider the feature set crossover with 2.7.
>
> Right, and IIRC that's why w
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-06-20 16:22:51 +1200:
> On 19 June 2015 at 02:18, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 6/18/15, 08:44, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
>
> > Does this mean that Debian is going to ignore classifiers for all projects
> > that list 3.4 without listing 3.5 and w
On 19 June 2015 at 02:18, Ian Cordasco wrote:
>
>
> On 6/18/15, 08:44, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
> Does this mean that Debian is going to ignore classifiers for all projects
> that list 3.4 without listing 3.5 and will start reporting bugs against
> them before upstream projects have time to start
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18/06/15 21:44, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> Based on that, I am confident in sticking with our plan of gating
>> using
>>> 3.4 for now and keeping an eye on the 3.5 packages being built
>>> by Debian and Canonical.
> Unless we shift platforms and go
On Jun 19, 2015 1:19 PM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 06/18/2015 09:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500:
> >> On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Exc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/18/2015 09:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500:
>> On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17
>>> +0200:
On 2015-06-18 15:48:28 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Based on that, I am confident in sticking with our plan of gating using
> 3.4 for now and keeping an eye on the 3.5 packages being built by Debian
> and Canonical.
Unless we shift platforms and go back to special-casing Py3K jobs, I
expe
Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500:
> On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> > Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
> > >
> > > As per the su
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
>> >
>> > As per the subject line, we
On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
> > Hi!
> >
> > tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
> >
> > As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
> > from Debian Experimen
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200:
> Hi!
>
> tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
>
> As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
> from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're
> already runn
On 6/18/15, 08:44, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
>Hi!
>
>tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
>
>As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
>from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're
>already running (unit) tests using Python
Hi!
tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :)
As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT,
from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're
already running (unit) tests using Python 3.5. Some have failures: I
could see issues in ceilom
16 matches
Mail list logo
