Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-22 Thread Victor Stinner
Hi, Le 18/06/2015 15:44, Thomas Goirand a écrit : As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT, from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're already running (unit) tests using Python 3.5. Some have failures: I could see issues in

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-20 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2015-06-20 16:22:51 +1200: On 19 June 2015 at 02:18, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 6/18/15, 08:44, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Does this mean that Debian is going to ignore classifiers for all projects that list

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-20 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dave Walker's message of 2015-06-20 14:05:48 +0100: On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: SNIP Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5 is an ecosystem question IMO, not an upstream one. 3.4 and 3.5 are very

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-20 Thread Dave Walker
On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: SNIP Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5 is an ecosystem question IMO, not an upstream one. 3.4 and 3.5 are very similar when you consider the feature set crossover with 2.7. Right, and

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-20 Thread Mark Kirkwood
On 21/06/15 01:32, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dave Walker's message of 2015-06-20 14:05:48 +0100: On 20 Jun 2015 1:05 pm, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: SNIP Whether we want to support 3.4 and 3.5, or just 3.4 and then just 3.5 is an ecosystem question IMO, not an

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-19 Thread Robert Collins
On 19 June 2015 at 02:18, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: On 6/18/15, 08:44, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Does this mean that Debian is going to ignore classifiers for all projects that list 3.4 without listing 3.5 and will start reporting bugs against them before

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-19 Thread Joe Gordon
On Jun 19, 2015 1:19 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/18/2015 09:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500: On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-19 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 18/06/15 21:44, Jeremy Stanley wrote: Based on that, I am confident in sticking with our plan of gating using 3.4 for now and keeping an eye on the 3.5 packages being built by Debian and Canonical. Unless we shift platforms and go back to

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-19 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/18/2015 09:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500: On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18

[openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi! tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :) As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT, from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're already running (unit) tests using Python 3.5. Some have failures: I could see issues in

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-18 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 6/18/15, 08:44, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: Hi! tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :) As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT, from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're already running (unit) tests using

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200: Hi! tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :) As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT, from Debian Experimental, in version beta 2). As a consequence, we're already running

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-18 Thread Daniel Comnea
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Brian Curtin br...@python.org wrote: On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200: Hi! tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :) As per the

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-18 Thread Brian Curtin
On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200: Hi! tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :) As per the subject line, we already have Python 3.5 in Debian (AFAICT, from Debian

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-18 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-06-18 15:48:28 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: Based on that, I am confident in sticking with our plan of gating using 3.4 for now and keeping an eye on the 3.5 packages being built by Debian and Canonical. Unless we shift platforms and go back to special-casing Py3K jobs, I expect

Re: [openstack-dev] Debian already using Python 3.5: please gate on that

2015-06-18 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Brian Curtin's message of 2015-06-18 13:17:52 -0500: On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2015-06-18 15:44:17 +0200: Hi! tl;dr: skip this message, the subject line is enough! :) As per the