On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>
>> One of the things that OpenStack does really well is review our process
>> for various activities. I don't believe we have had a discussion in the
>> past reviewing our electoral process and I think it would be good to
>> have this discu
> One of the things that OpenStack does really well is review our process
> for various activities. I don't believe we have had a discussion in the
> past reviewing our electoral process and I think it would be good to
> have this discussion.
>
> There are two issues that I feel need to be addre
quot;
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Election Stats and Review Discussion
>Joshua Harlow writes:
>
>> Is there any kind of central location where we can look at what a TC
>> candidate has done before (what their proposals we, what they voted on,
>>or
>> any other simil
Joshua Harlow writes:
> Is there any kind of central location where we can look at what a TC
> candidate has done before (what their proposals we, what they voted on, or
> any other similar kind of information; in a way this is similar to having
> visibility into what a US congressman/senator doe
4 at 7:45 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
, "openstack...@lists.openstack.org"
Subject: [openstack-dev] Election Stats and Review Discussion
>One of the things that OpenStack does really well is review our process
>for various activities. I don't believe we have had a d
Hi,
I previously spend 7 years involved in a group that drove voter
engagement in a large organisation that faced similar issues.
We learnt a few things in that time.
1. Easy access to information is key.
1. Don't assume people will read the mailing lists - there
One of the things that OpenStack does really well is review our process
for various activities. I don't believe we have had a discussion in the
past reviewing our electoral process and I think it would be good to
have this discussion.
There are two issues that I feel need to be addressed:
Item One
