Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
Right, I think this is the 'procedural -2' case, which feels like we
need another state for things that are being held for procedural
reasons, which is unrelated to normal code-review.
We have been looking into that and believe we may be able to do
something
I feel the need to abandon changes that seem abandoned. I believe this has
been covered to death now, so I'm going to shelve that conversation for a
while, and talk about missing tooling in gerrit.
One of the examples of something that was auto-abandoned wrongly was a
patch on hold until some
On 3 March 2015 at 17:23, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
Does the tool ignore patches with Workflow-1 set (work in progress)?
So if it doesn't then we can easily change it to do so, however, I think a
WIP progress patch that hasn't been updated for months counts as abandoned
for
