Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-21 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/15/2017 6:22 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I have no idea. I'm guessing someone will ping me when the time comes and I'll mosey on over. For whatever doesn't get covered, or needs to spill over, Nova is already going to have a block of time to talk about quota-related things (not just this) so

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-17 Thread Sajeesh Cimson Sasi
: Matt Riedemann [mriede...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 February 2017 04:52:22 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG? On 2/15/2017 1:40 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > Will there be a dedicated time finalized for this as we get closer to >

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-15 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/15/2017 1:40 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: Will there be a dedicated time finalized for this as we get closer to next week? I have no idea. I'm guessing someone will ping me when the time comes and I'll mosey on over. For whatever doesn't get covered, or needs to spill over, Nova is

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-15 Thread Lance Bragstad
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 2/15/2017 12:07 PM, Sajeesh Cimson Sasi wrote: > >> Hi Matt, Andrey, >> CERN-BARC team was working on nested quota >> implementation in Nova some 3 years back.But at that time, it was decided

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-15 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/15/2017 12:07 PM, Sajeesh Cimson Sasi wrote: Hi Matt, Andrey, CERN-BARC team was working on nested quota implementation in Nova some 3 years back.But at that time, it was decided to fix bugs in the existing quota driver rather than adding more features. After

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-15 Thread Sajeesh Cimson Sasi
Volkov [avol...@mirantis.com] Sent: 13 February 2017 15:33:54 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG? Hi Matt, > But it's unclear to some (at least me) what those > issues are. I believe issues were resol

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-13 Thread Andrey Volkov
Hi Matt, > But it's unclear to some (at least me) what those > issues are. I believe issues were resolved. I made a retrospective by working with bugs and repository history what problems cinder encountered with quotas. - First, hierarchical quotas were implemented in DbQuotaDriver but

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-12 Thread Tim Bell
On 12 Feb 2017, at 12:13, Boris Bobrov > wrote: I would like to talk about it too. On 02/10/2017 11:56 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Operators want hierarchical quotas [1]. Nova doesn't have them yet and we've been hesitant to invest scarce

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-12 Thread Boris Bobrov
I would like to talk about it too. On 02/10/2017 11:56 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Operators want hierarchical quotas [1]. Nova doesn't have them yet and > we've been hesitant to invest scarce developer resources in them since > we've heard that the implementation for hierarchical quotas in

Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-11 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 02:56:56PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Operators want hierarchical quotas [1]. Nova doesn't have them yet and we've > been hesitant to invest scarce developer resources in them since we've heard > that the implementation for hierarchical quotas in Cinder has some issues.

[openstack-dev] Hierarchical quotas at the PTG?

2017-02-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
Operators want hierarchical quotas [1]. Nova doesn't have them yet and we've been hesitant to invest scarce developer resources in them since we've heard that the implementation for hierarchical quotas in Cinder has some issues. But it's unclear to some (at least me) what those issues are.