another issue we(kolla gate) meet is libvirtd got segment fault.
Here is the log from host messages file. But i do not get other issue in
nova.conf expect can not connect libvirt.
Dec 25 13:40:54 localhost kernel: libvirtd[5720]: segfault at 8 ip
7fa70379b823 sp 7fa6faa061c0 error 4 in li
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 1:37 PM Steve Gordon wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Neil Jerram"
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> >
> > I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to
- Original Message -
> From: "Neil Jerram"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
>
> I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to its
> developers, but I am seeing further issues that look associated with the
> recent CentOS 7
- Original Message -
> From: "Neil Jerram"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Cc: "Steve Gordon"
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 5:53:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt trans
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM Neil Jerram wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM Steve Gordon wrote:
>
> > If you haven't already I would suggest grabbing qemu-kvm-ev from the
> CentOS
> > > Virt SIG repos:
> > >
> > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/
> > >
> > >
> From: "Neil Jerram"
> > > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> > > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 6:40:57 AM
> > > > Subject: [openstack-dev] I
- Original Message -
> From: "Neil Jerram"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10:53:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0
> (Cent
December 16, 2016 6:40:57 AM
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0
> (CentOS 7.3)
> >
> > I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to
> its
> > developers, but I am seeing further issues that lo
- Original Message -
> From: "Neil Jerram"
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 6:40:57 AM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0
>
Another thought/query about this: is the libvirt transition from 1.2.7 to
2.0.0 less than usually conservative for an RHEL/CentOS series, and if so,
is there a wider reason or move there that it would help to be aware of?
Also is there a way of continuing to use CentOS 7 as a platform but still
usi
I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to its
developers, but I am seeing further issues that look associated with the
recent CentOS 7 transition from libvirt 1.2.7 to libvirt 2.0.0, and would
appreciate any comments on them that people may have. I believe these
issue
11 matches
Mail list logo
