Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-25 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
​another issue we(kolla gate) meet is libvirtd got segment fault. Here is the log from host messages file. But i do not get other issue in nova.conf expect can not connect libvirt. Dec 25 13:40:54 localhost kernel: libvirtd[5720]: segfault at 8 ip 7fa70379b823 sp 7fa6faa061c0 error 4 in

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-23 Thread Neil Jerram
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 1:37 PM Steve Gordon wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Neil Jerram" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > > I appreciate that even libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-23 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Neil Jerram" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to its > developers, but I am seeing further

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-21 Thread Steve Gordon
day, December 19, 2016 5:53:02 AM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 > (CentOS 7.3) > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM Neil Jerram <n...@tigera.io> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM Steve Gordon <sgor.

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-19 Thread Neil Jerram
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM Neil Jerram wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM Steve Gordon wrote: > > > If you haven't already I would suggest grabbing qemu-kvm-ev from the > CentOS > > > Virt SIG repos: > > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Neil Jerram
nstack.org> > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10:53:02 AM > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> > 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3) > > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:35 PM Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Steve Gordon
gt; > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 6:40:57 AM > > > Subject: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Neil Jerram
@lists.openstack.org> > > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 6:40:57 AM > > Subject: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 > (CentOS 7.3) > > > > I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to > its > > de

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - > From: "Neil Jerram" <n...@tigera.io> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 6:40:57 AM > Subject: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Neil Jerram
Another thought/query about this: is the libvirt transition from 1.2.7 to 2.0.0 less than usually conservative for an RHEL/CentOS series, and if so, is there a wider reason or move there that it would help to be aware of? Also is there a way of continuing to use CentOS 7 as a platform but still

[openstack-dev] Issues with libvirt transition 1.2.7 -> 2.0.0 (CentOS 7.3)

2016-12-16 Thread Neil Jerram
I appreciate that even libvirt 2.0.0 will be ancient history by now, to its developers, but I am seeing further issues that look associated with the recent CentOS 7 transition from libvirt 1.2.7 to libvirt 2.0.0, and would appreciate any comments on them that people may have. I believe these