Re: [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-06 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
t for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 1:14 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>, "openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org>

Re: [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-03 Thread Dean Troyer
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote: > I suppose I am also philosophically opposed to having all these special > snowflake working groups. If you want to get things done in OpenStack > the best thing to do is roll up your sleeves and start participating >

Re: [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-03 Thread Sean M. Collins
Jay Pipes wrote: > 4) I see a lot of agenda items around projects like Gluon, Craton, Watcher, > and Blazar. I don't see any concrete ideas about talking with the developers > of the key infrastructure services that OpenStack is built around. How does > the LCOO plan on reaching out to the

Re: [openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-02 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 02/02/2017 20:17, Jay Pipes wrote: > Hi, > > I was told about this group today. I have a few questions. Hopefully > someone from this team can illuminate me with some answers. > > 1) What is the purpose of this group? The wiki states that the team > "aims to define the use cases and identify

[openstack-dev] Large Contributing OpenStack Operators working group?

2017-02-02 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi, I was told about this group today. I have a few questions. Hopefully someone from this team can illuminate me with some answers. 1) What is the purpose of this group? The wiki states that the team "aims to define the use cases and identify and prioritise the requirements which are