+100 also :)
2014/1/10 Joe Gordon :
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:34 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
>> > > > On Thu
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:34 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ho
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 10/01/14 11:28 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>
>> Personally I think we should (and we can) say NO more often. As we get
>>
> stronger as a dev community it becomes easier, and I think we see more
>> "opinionated" choices in younger proje
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:34 -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2014-01
On 10/01/14 11:28 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 09/01/14 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
I also think projects should try to minimize configuration options at
their minimum so operators are completely lost. Opening the sample
nova.conf and seeing 696 options is not wha
Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 09/01/14 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
>> I also think projects should try to minimize configuration options at
>> their minimum so operators are completely lost. Opening the sample
>> nova.conf and seeing 696 options is not what I would call user friendly.
>>
>> And
On 09/01/14 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Hi Jeremy
Don't you think it is burden for operators if we should choose correct
combination of config for multip
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >
> > > Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> > >> Hi Jeremy
> > >>
> > >>
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> > Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> >> Hi Jeremy
> >>
> >> Don't you think it is burden for operators if we should choose corr
On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
>
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy
>>
>> Don't you think it is burden for operators if we should choose correct
>> combination of config for multiple nodes even if we have chef and
10 matches
Mail list logo