Re: [openstack-dev] ML2 TypeManager question

2015-12-09 Thread Kevin Benton
So in that case don't we need to update the type driver API to pass that through to the allocation call? On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Sławek Kapłoński wrote: > Hello, > > In fact we were creating our own type driver and we want to use this > tenant_id > so it was good that it is here :) But

Re: [openstack-dev] ML2 TypeManager question

2015-12-09 Thread Sławek Kapłoński
Hello, In fact we were creating our own type driver and we want to use this tenant_id so it was good that it is here :) But I was just curious why it is like that. Thanks. -- Pozdrawiam / Best regards Sławek Kapłoński sla...@kaplonski.pl Dnia Wednesday 09 of December 2015 09:55:36 Kevin Benton

Re: [openstack-dev] ML2 TypeManager question

2015-12-09 Thread Kevin Benton
It does not appear to be used. I suspect maybe the original intention is that this could be passed to the type driver which might do something special depending on the tenant_id. However, the type driver interface does not include the tenant_id in 'allocate_tenant_segment' so we should either updat

[openstack-dev] ML2 TypeManager question

2015-12-07 Thread Sławek Kapłoński
Hello, Recently I was checking something in code of ML2 Type manager (neutron.plugins.ml2.managers) and I found in TypeManager class in method create_network_segments that to this method as argument is passed "tenant_id" but I can't find where it is used. Can someone more experienced explain me