Monty Taylor wrote:
* How do we handle proxies ? Giving temporary +2 to a non-TC member
sounds like a bit of pain
I do not think we'd need proxies anymore - as the vote wouldn't have to
happen within the IRC meeting.
Maybe it's just me, but I usually wait for the meeting to actually make
my
On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 10:55 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
* How do we handle proxies ? Giving temporary +2 to a non-TC member
sounds like a bit of pain
I do not think we'd need proxies anymore - as the vote wouldn't have to
happen within the IRC meeting.
Maybe
On 08/08/2013 09:30 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
I think what Monty might be getting at is that TC decisions would no
longer happen by default with people voting at a particular TC meeting.
Rather a discussion would happen on the mailing list with people casting
their
On 2013-08-07 13:45:56 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote:
Actually, having a record outside of Gerrit doesn't require
cherry-pick mode.
[...]
Ah! Thanks. For some reason I'd gotten it into my head that git
notes altered the commit itself, but that's quite clearly not the
case.
So given
On Tue, Aug 06 2013, Monty Taylor wrote:
This would allow for clear voting by both the TC and others - is
consistent with tooling we ALL know how to use, and has the benefit of
producing a clear published record of the results when it's done. That
way also, TC members and others can do a
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
What if instead we had a repo with a bunch of ReStructureText in it -
perhaps a copy of the TC charter and then a dir for additional things
the TC has decided. That repo would be autopublished to
On 2013-08-07 09:35:33 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
Would it make sense to have a copy of the votes at the end of that RST
file (or somewhere in that commit) ? This will replicate vote results
to our repo instead of just keeping them in Gerrit - in case the later
goes down.
[...]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/07/2013 04:51 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06 2013, Monty Taylor wrote:
This would allow for clear voting by both the TC and others - is
consistent with tooling we ALL know how to use, and has the
benefit of producing a clear
On 08/07/2013 05:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Monty Taylor wrote:
What if instead we had a repo with a bunch of ReStructureText in it -
perhaps a copy of the TC charter and then a dir for additional things
the TC has decided. That repo would be autopublished to a non-wiki
website ... and
Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org writes:
On 2013-08-07 09:35:33 +0200 (+0200), Flavio Percoco wrote:
[...]
Would it make sense to have a copy of the votes at the end of that RST
file (or somewhere in that commit) ? This will replicate vote results
to our repo instead of just keeping them in
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hi!
Currently, we make motions by email, then we discuss them by mailing
list, then we discuss them more in IRC, then we vote on them - at which
point the actual thing voted on may or may not get recorded somewhere
Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com writes:
Hi!
Currently, we make motions by email, then we discuss them by mailing
list, then we discuss them more in IRC, then we vote on them - at which
point the actual thing voted on may or may not get recorded somewhere
easy to find.
What if instead we
+1
2013/8/6 Morgan Fainberg m...@metacloud.com:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hi!
Currently, we make motions by email, then we discuss them by mailing
list, then we discuss them more in IRC, then we vote on them - at which
point the actual thing
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hi!
Currently, we make motions by email, then we discuss them by mailing
list, then we discuss them more in IRC, then we vote on them - at which
point the actual thing voted on may or may not get recorded somewhere
14 matches
Mail list logo
