On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 02:33:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
This has the advantage of not using flash at all (pure
On 01/03/2014 01:03 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
On 2014-01-01 00:33, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
This has the advantage of not using flash
This seems like a great choice, assuming that we can verify that it works
properly.
Vish
On Dec 31, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
On 01/01/2014 07:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
This has the advantage of not using flash at all (pure javascript), and
On 2014-01-01 00:33, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
This has the advantage of not using flash at all (pure javascript), and
continuing to
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
This has the advantage of not using flash at all (pure javascript), and
continuing to work on all browsers, with a much cleaner
