On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:33:22PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
> > of libvirt 0.9.6.
> ...
> > If there are other distros I've missed which expect to support deploymen
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:50:03PM +1100, Tom Fifield wrote:
> On 20/11/13 14:33, Robert Collins wrote:
> >On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
> >>of libvirt 0.9.6.
> >...
> >>If there are other distros I'v
On 20/11/13 14:33, Robert Collins wrote:
On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
of libvirt 0.9.6.
...
If there are other distros I've missed which expect to support deployment
of Icehouse please add them to t
On 20 November 2013 08:02, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
> of libvirt 0.9.6.
...
> If there are other distros I've missed which expect to support deployment
> of Icehouse please add them to this list. Hopefully there won't be any
Currently the Nova libvirt driver is declaring that it wants a minimum
of libvirt 0.9.6.
For cases where we use features newer than this, we have to do conditional
logic to ensure we operate correctly on old libvirt. We don't want to keep
adding conditionals forever since they complicate the code
