On 02/17/2015 07:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:16:46PM +0100, Christian Berendt wrote:
>> On 02/17/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> In section 4.(c) the LICENSE text says
>>>
>>> (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
>>>
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 01:16:46PM +0100, Christian Berendt wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > In section 4.(c) the LICENSE text says
> >
> > (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
> > that You distribute, all copyright, patent,
On 02/17/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> In section 4.(c) the LICENSE text says
>
> (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works
> that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and
> attribution notices from the Source form of the Wo
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:28:58AM +0100, Christian Berendt wrote:
> Is it safe to remove copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license
> headers stated in a lot of files?
>
> We recenctly removed all @author tags and added a hacking check to not
> longer add @author tags in the future. Can we
Is it safe to remove copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license
headers stated in a lot of files?
We recenctly removed all @author tags and added a hacking check to not
longer add @author tags in the future. Can we do the same for the
copyright statements above the Apache 2.0 license header
