Re: [openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now open

2014-04-09 Thread Tina TSOU
Dear Thierry,



Thanks for your suggestion.



It is submitted as below.

http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/create


Topic

Title (Click to view/edit)

Proposer

Status

Neutron

Scaling Network Performance for Large 
Clouds<http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/270>

Tina Tsou

U Unreviewed






Thank you,

Tina





-Original Message-
From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 6:36 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now 
open



Tina TSOU wrote:

> Below is our proposal. Look forward to your feedback.

>

> --

> Description

> This session focuses on how to improve networking performance at large scale 
> deployment.

> For example

> - having many VMs, thousands to tens of thousands, in a single data

> center

> - very heavy traffic between VMs of different physical servers

> - large quantities of OpenFlow flow tables causing slow forwarding on

> OVS and high CPU usage on hypervisor

> - VMs belong to various tenants thus requiring traffic isolation and

> security and lots of configuration on OVS mainly overlay encapsulation

> and OpenFlow tables

> - neutron server taking too long time to process requests

>

> We are introducing a solution designed for the above scenario in this area.

> The main idea is to deploy on the hypervisor a new monitor agent which will 
> periodically check the CPU usage and network load of the NIC and inform SDN 
> controller through plugin/API extension. If the OVS load goes very high, SDN 
> controller can reactively off-load the traffic from OVS to TOR with minimum 
> interruption. It means that initially, the overlay encapsulation might be 
> done on OVS, but some feature rich TORs also provide this functionality which 
> makes TOR capable of taking over whenever necessary. The same strategy will 
> be applied for OpenFlow flow table. By doing this, OVS will have nothing to 
> do other than sending the traffic to TOR. All the time-consuming jobs will be 
> taken over by TOR dynamically. This more advanced strategy does require TOR 
> to be feature-rich so it might cause more TCO.

>

> We believe this is worth doing for large scale deployment.

> --



You should file it at summit.openstack.org so that it can be considered for 
inclusion in the schedule.



Regards,



--

Thierry Carrez (ttx)



___

OpenStack-dev mailing list

OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
<>___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now open

2014-04-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
Tina TSOU wrote:
> Below is our proposal. Look forward to your feedback.
> 
> --
> Description 
> This session focuses on how to improve networking performance at large scale 
> deployment.
> For example
> - having many VMs, thousands to tens of thousands, in a single data center 
> - very heavy traffic between VMs of different physical servers 
> - large quantities of OpenFlow flow tables causing slow forwarding on OVS and 
> high CPU usage on hypervisor 
> - VMs belong to various tenants thus requiring traffic isolation and security 
> and lots of configuration on OVS mainly overlay encapsulation and OpenFlow 
> tables
> - neutron server taking too long time to process requests
> 
> We are introducing a solution designed for the above scenario in this area.
> The main idea is to deploy on the hypervisor a new monitor agent which will 
> periodically check the CPU usage and network load of the NIC and inform SDN 
> controller through plugin/API extension. If the OVS load goes very high, SDN 
> controller can reactively off-load the traffic from OVS to TOR with minimum 
> interruption. It means that initially, the overlay encapsulation might be 
> done on OVS, but some feature rich TORs also provide this functionality which 
> makes TOR capable of taking over whenever necessary. The same strategy will 
> be applied for OpenFlow flow table. By doing this, OVS will have nothing to 
> do other than sending the traffic to TOR. All the time-consuming jobs will be 
> taken over by TOR dynamically. This more advanced strategy does require TOR 
> to be feature-rich so it might cause more TCO.   
> 
> We believe this is worth doing for large scale deployment. 
> --

You should file it at summit.openstack.org so that it can be considered
for inclusion in the schedule.

Regards,

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now open

2014-04-08 Thread Tina TSOU
Dear all,

Below is our proposal. Look forward to your feedback.

--
Description 
This session focuses on how to improve networking performance at large scale 
deployment.
For example
- having many VMs, thousands to tens of thousands, in a single data center 
- very heavy traffic between VMs of different physical servers 
- large quantities of OpenFlow flow tables causing slow forwarding on OVS and 
high CPU usage on hypervisor 
- VMs belong to various tenants thus requiring traffic isolation and security 
and lots of configuration on OVS mainly overlay encapsulation and OpenFlow 
tables
- neutron server taking too long time to process requests

We are introducing a solution designed for the above scenario in this area.
The main idea is to deploy on the hypervisor a new monitor agent which will 
periodically check the CPU usage and network load of the NIC and inform SDN 
controller through plugin/API extension. If the OVS load goes very high, SDN 
controller can reactively off-load the traffic from OVS to TOR with minimum 
interruption. It means that initially, the overlay encapsulation might be done 
on OVS, but some feature rich TORs also provide this functionality which makes 
TOR capable of taking over whenever necessary. The same strategy will be 
applied for OpenFlow flow table. By doing this, OVS will have nothing to do 
other than sending the traffic to TOR. All the time-consuming jobs will be 
taken over by TOR dynamically. This more advanced strategy does require TOR to 
be feature-rich so it might cause more TCO.   

We believe this is worth doing for large scale deployment. 
--
 

Thank you,
Tina

-Original Message-
From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] 
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 8:07 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now 
open

Thierry Carrez wrote:
> We have two *new* categories this time around:
> 
> "Cross-project workshops"
> Those will be used to discuss topics which affect all OpenStack 
> projects, and therefore increase convergence and collaboration across 
> program barriers.
> 
> "Other projects"
> Those will let unofficial, OpenStack-related, open source projects to 
> have a design discussion within the Design Summit area. We'll limit 
> this to one session per project to give room to as many projects as possible.
> 
> You have until *April 20* to suggest sessions. Proposed session topics 
> will be reviewed by PTLs afterwards, potentially merged with other 
> suggestions before being scheduled.

In order to facilitate travel organization, we've been asked to confirm which 
projects are accepted in the "Other projects" track ASAP. We'll therefore have 
a slightly shorter deadline for that track to give proposals a final answer 
before mid-April.

It's also useful for us to know which topics are covered in the "Cross-project 
workshops" before we go and schedule the program-specific categories, so we'll 
also have a shorter deadline for proposals on cross-project workshops as well.

For both categories, please submit suggestions before *April 10* if you want to 
be considered fairly. After that date, proposals may still be considered if any 
slots are left, but most likely all the slots will have been allocated.

Thanks,

--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now open

2014-03-31 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote:
> We have two *new* categories this time around:
> 
> "Cross-project workshops"
> Those will be used to discuss topics which affect all OpenStack
> projects, and therefore increase convergence and collaboration across
> program barriers.
> 
> "Other projects"
> Those will let unofficial, OpenStack-related, open source projects to
> have a design discussion within the Design Summit area. We'll limit this
> to one session per project to give room to as many projects as possible.
> 
> You have until *April 20* to suggest sessions. Proposed session topics
> will be reviewed by PTLs afterwards, potentially merged with other
> suggestions before being scheduled.

In order to facilitate travel organization, we've been asked to confirm
which projects are accepted in the "Other projects" track ASAP. We'll
therefore have a slightly shorter deadline for that track to give
proposals a final answer before mid-April.

It's also useful for us to know which topics are covered in the
"Cross-project workshops" before we go and schedule the program-specific
categories, so we'll also have a shorter deadline for proposals on
cross-project workshops as well.

For both categories, please submit suggestions before *April 10* if you
want to be considered fairly. After that date, proposals may still be
considered if any slots are left, but most likely all the slots will
have been allocated.

Thanks,

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now open

2014-03-07 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> thanks for opening sessions suggestions for Design Summit. Could you,
> please, rename Savanna topic to "Sahara (ex. Savanna)"?

Done!

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now open

2014-03-07 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi Thierry,

thanks for opening sessions suggestions for Design Summit. Could you,
please, rename Savanna topic to "Sahara (ex. Savanna)"?

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Thierry Carrez  wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> TL;DR:
> The session suggestion website for the Juno Design Summit (which will
> happen at the OpenStack Summit in Atlanta) is now open at:
> http://summit.openstack.org/
>
> Long version:
>
> The "Juno Design Summit" is a specific event part of the overall
> "OpenStack Summit" in Atlanta. It is different from classic tracks in
> a number of ways.
>
> * It starts on Tuesday morning and ends on Friday evening.
>
> * There are *no formal presentations or speakers*. The sessions at the
> design summit are open discussions between contributors on a specific
> development topic for the upcoming development cycle, generally
> moderated by the PTL or the person who proposed the session. While it is
> possible to prepare a few slides to introduce the current status and
> kick-off the discussion, these should never be formal
> speaker-to-audience presentations. If that's what you're after, the
> presentations in the other tracks of the OpenStack Summit are for you.
>
> * There is no community voting on the content. The Juno Design Summit is
> split into multiple topics (one for each official OpenStack Program),
> and the elected program PTL will be ultimately responsible for selecting
> the content he deems important for the upcoming cycle. If you want to be
> PTL in place of the PTL, we'll be holding elections for that in the
> coming weeks :)
>
> With all this in mind, please feel free to suggest topics of discussion
> for this event. The website to do this is open at:
>
> http://summit.openstack.org/
>
> You'll need to go through Launchpad SSO to log on that site (same auth
> we use for review.openstack.org and all our core development
> infrastructure). If you're lost, try the Help link at the bottom of the
> page. If all else fails, send me an email.
>
> Please take extra care when selecting the topic your suggestion belongs
> in. You can see the complete list of topics at:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Juno
>
> We have two *new* categories this time around:
>
> "Cross-project workshops"
> Those will be used to discuss topics which affect all OpenStack
> projects, and therefore increase convergence and collaboration across
> program barriers.
>
> "Other projects"
> Those will let unofficial, OpenStack-related, open source projects to
> have a design discussion within the Design Summit area. We'll limit this
> to one session per project to give room to as many projects as possible.
>
> You have until *April 20* to suggest sessions. Proposed session topics
> will be reviewed by PTLs afterwards, potentially merged with other
> suggestions before being scheduled.
>
> You can also comment on proposed sessions to suggest scheduling
> constraints or sessions it could be merged with.
>
> More information about the Juno Design Summit can be found at:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] Session suggestions for the Juno Design Summit now open

2014-03-07 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone,

TL;DR:
The session suggestion website for the Juno Design Summit (which will
happen at the OpenStack Summit in Atlanta) is now open at:
http://summit.openstack.org/

Long version:

The "Juno Design Summit" is a specific event part of the overall
"OpenStack Summit" in Atlanta. It is different from classic tracks in
a number of ways.

* It starts on Tuesday morning and ends on Friday evening.

* There are *no formal presentations or speakers*. The sessions at the
design summit are open discussions between contributors on a specific
development topic for the upcoming development cycle, generally
moderated by the PTL or the person who proposed the session. While it is
possible to prepare a few slides to introduce the current status and
kick-off the discussion, these should never be formal
speaker-to-audience presentations. If that's what you're after, the
presentations in the other tracks of the OpenStack Summit are for you.

* There is no community voting on the content. The Juno Design Summit is
split into multiple topics (one for each official OpenStack Program),
and the elected program PTL will be ultimately responsible for selecting
the content he deems important for the upcoming cycle. If you want to be
PTL in place of the PTL, we'll be holding elections for that in the
coming weeks :)

With all this in mind, please feel free to suggest topics of discussion
for this event. The website to do this is open at:

http://summit.openstack.org/

You'll need to go through Launchpad SSO to log on that site (same auth
we use for review.openstack.org and all our core development
infrastructure). If you're lost, try the Help link at the bottom of the
page. If all else fails, send me an email.

Please take extra care when selecting the topic your suggestion belongs
in. You can see the complete list of topics at:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Juno

We have two *new* categories this time around:

"Cross-project workshops"
Those will be used to discuss topics which affect all OpenStack
projects, and therefore increase convergence and collaboration across
program barriers.

"Other projects"
Those will let unofficial, OpenStack-related, open source projects to
have a design discussion within the Design Summit area. We'll limit this
to one session per project to give room to as many projects as possible.

You have until *April 20* to suggest sessions. Proposed session topics
will be reviewed by PTLs afterwards, potentially merged with other
suggestions before being scheduled.

You can also comment on proposed sessions to suggest scheduling
constraints or sessions it could be merged with.

More information about the Juno Design Summit can be found at:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit

Cheers,

-- 
Thierry Carrez (ttx)

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev